Abstract
Purpose: The landscape of academic publishing is experiencing significant transformations, characterized by an increasing volume of research output and the growth of interdisciplinary studies. These developments pose complex challenges for editorial boards, necessitating advanced strategies for submission management and the maintenance of publication standards.Methods: Utilizing network analysis, this study examined 1,865 articles from <i>Applied Biological Chemistry</i> and 1,081 articles from <i>Journal of Applied Biological Chemistry</i>, revealing distinct thematic and methodological orientations within these journals.Results: <i>Applied Biological Chemistry</i> demonstrated a pronounced focus on extraction processes, while <i>Journal of Applied Biological Chemistry</i> focused more on fermentation techniques and enzymatic studies. This differentiation highlights the journals’ unique contributions to the field of applied life sciences and underscores the diversity within academic publishing.Conclusion: The findings of this study not only shed light on the subtle distinctions between <i>Applied Biological Chemistry</i> and <i>Journal of Applied Biological Chemistry</i> but also emphasize the critical role of articulating the journal scope in detail in helping authors find the most suitable publication venues for their interdisciplinary research. By showcasing the utility of bibliometrics and network analysis, this research provides valuable insights for editorial boards to refine their management processes and for authors to navigate the complex landscape of academic publishing effectively, thereby enhancing the dissemination and impact of scholarly work.
Funder
National Research Foundation of Korea
Ministry of Science and ICT
Publisher
Korean Council of Science Editors