Abstract
This paper examines the historical boundaries of relying upon risk assessment as the bedrock of environmental law. It does so by revisiting a number of historical environmental and public health cases that illustrate the ebbs and flows of judicial and regulatory insights into uncertain science. The paper concludes that the current approach to dealing with scientific uncertainty and doubt based on risk and quantification in environmental law is flawed. A fresh look at the frontiers of science doctrine which developed the link between, novelty, uncertain science and ignorance requires fresh appraisal. Without this key doctrine in place neither a precautionary approach nor the EU’s precautionary principle can function as a driver for key environmental protection.
Publisher
sofia - Society for Institutional Analysis
Reference79 articles.
1. Anderson, C. (2017): Evolving Concepts of Science and Legitimacy: Insights from American Administrative Law, in Weimer & De Ruijter Regulating Risks in the European Union: The Co-production of Expert and Executive Power (Hart Publishing).
2. Asselt van M. & E. Vos (2006), The Precautionary Principle and the Uncertainty Paradox, Journal of Risk Research, 9/4.
3. Bilott R. (2020): Exposure, (Simon & Schuster).
4. Black J. (2004): The Role of Risk in Regulatory Processes, in Robert Baldwin, Martin Cave, and Martin Lodge (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Regulation (OUP 2010); J. Steele, Risks and Legal Theory (Hart Publishing).
5. Boehmer-Christiansen S. (1994): The Precautionary Principle in Germany: Enabling Government, in Timothy O’Riordan and James Cameron (eds), Interpreting the Precautionary Principle (Earthscan Publications).