Unsuccessful misoprostol induction in pregnant women: an integrative review

Author:

Brito Juliana Oliveira1ORCID,Damasceno Ana Kelve de Castro2ORCID,Rios Ana Jéssica Silveira2ORCID,Carneiro Jéssica Lourenço2ORCID,Nour Guilherme Frederico Abdul1ORCID,Vasconcelos Camila Teixeira Moreira2ORCID,Carvalho Francisco Herlânio Costa2ORCID,Gonçalves Emilcy Rebouças1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Maternidade Escola Assis Chateaubriand

2. Universidade Federal do Ceará

Abstract

Objective: To analyze the evidence available in literature regarding unsuccessful labor induction with misoprostol in full-term pregnancies. Methods: This is an integrative review, carried out between January and November 2022, whose research question and descriptors were outlined using the PECO strategy. The searches were carried out in the MEDLINE, Web of Science, CINAHL, EMBASE and Scopus databases by two researchers independently as well as assessment. For the study selection and identification phase, the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) was used. The risk of bias assessment of included articles was carried out using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Results: A total of 3,674 articles were identified, and 84 were read in full, of which 11 comprised the review (n=9,010 pregnant women), published between 2005 and 2021, with the majority in the United States. Regarding the level of evidence, all articles were classified as 2b, assessed according to the design of each study. The study showed evidence regarding the following factors: High BMI (greater than 30 kg/m2), nulliparity, immature bishop, cervical length (greater than 30 mm), height, ethnicity (non-Caucasians from southern Europe) and fetal weight (greater equal to 4 kg). Conclusion: The objective study was achieved, having demonstrated six maternal factors and one fetal factor that can lead to unsuccessful induction. It is worth highlighting the need for evidence that incorporates the individuality of each characteristic and the contribution of this study to support the choice of the best conduct for each pregnancy on an individual basis stands out.

Funder

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior

Publisher

Acta Paulista de Enfermagem

Reference33 articles.

1. 1. Scapin SQ, Gregório VR, Collaço VS, Knobel R. Indução de parto em um hospital universitário: métodos e desfechos. Texto Contexto Enferm. 2018;27(1):e0710016

2. 2. Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Secretaria de Ciência, Tecnologia e Insumos Estratégicos. Departamento de Gestão e Incorporação de Tecnologias em Saúde. Diretrizes nacionais de assistência ao parto normal: versão resumida. Brasília (DF): Ministério da Saúde; 2017 [citado 2023 Ago 17]. Disponível em: https://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/publicacoes/diretrizes_nacionais_assistencia_parto_normal.pdf

3. 3. Grobman WA, Rice MM, Reddy UM, Tita AT, Silver RM, Mallett G, Hill K, Thom EA, El-Sayed YY, Perez-Delboy A, Rouse DJ, Saade GR, Boggess KA, Chauhan SP, Iams JD, Chien EK, Casey BM, Gibbs RS, Srinivas SK, Swamy GK, Simhan HN, Macones GA; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal–Fetal Medicine Units Network. Labor Induction versus Expectant Management in Low-Risk Nulliparous Women. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(6):513-23.

4. 4. American College Of Obstetricians And Gynecologists (ACOG). Clinical Guidance for Integration of the Findings of The ARRIVE Trial: Labor induction versus expectant management in low-risk nulliparous women. Washington, DC: ACOG; 2018 [cited 2023 Aug 17]. Available from: https://www.acog.org/clinical/clinical-guidance/practice-advisory/articles/2018/08/clinical-guidance-for-integration-of-the-findings-of-the-arrive-trial

5. 5. Berghella V, Bellussi F, Schoen CN. Evidence-based labor management: induction of labor (part 2). Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2020;2(3):100136. Review.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3