Towards a Communist Armed Conflict Indigenous Settlement Framework: Revisiting Vietnam, Singapore, and Taiwan Experience
-
Published:2024
Issue:8
Volume:2
Page:
-
ISSN:2984-8288
-
Container-title:Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives
-
language:
-
Short-container-title:JIP
Abstract
Armed conflicts between governments and indigenous inhabitants in Singapore, Taiwan, and Vietnam have deep roots in historical tensions and the marginalization of minority groups. This qualitative study explores these factors and evaluates government strategies for conflict resolution, focusing on disparities in settlement, education, employment, and community engagement. Government actions such as military operations, peacebuilding, and comprehensive programs were analyzed. Singapore's strategies, including community engagement and socio-economic development, fostered stability and inclusivity. Taiwan's reconciliation efforts, including apologies and democratization, reduced conflict and promoted indigenous rights. Vietnam's initiatives for ethnic minority development underscored its commitment to peace through inclusive approaches. Historical contexts in these countries, marked by ethnic tensions, colonial legacies, and ideological divisions, shaped significant violence and social divisions, necessitating robust security measures and reconciliation efforts. Lessons learned emphasize diplomacy, international cooperation, and socio-economic integration for lasting peace. Governments must prioritize dialogue, inclusive policies, and sustainable development supported by international partnerships. Effective conflict resolution integrates socioeconomic development and reconciliation efforts, crucial for building resilient societies and fostering peace among Indigenous populations.
Publisher
TWR Book Publishing Services
Reference25 articles.
1. Allen, L., & Louis, W. R. (1993). Singapore 1942: End of Empire. Routledge. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000211328 2. Bayly, C., & Harper, T. (2005). Forgotten Armies: The Fall of British Asia, 1941-1945. Harvard University Press. 3. Bendavid, E., Boerma, T., Akseer, N., Langer, A., Malembaka, E. B., Okiro, E. A., Wise, P. H., Heft-Neal, S., Black, R. E., Bhutta, Z. A., Bhutta, Z., Black, R., Blanchet, K., Boerma, T., Gaffey, M., Langer, A., Spiegel, P., Waldman, R., & Wise, P. (2021). The effects of armed conflict on the health of women and children. The Lancet, 397(10273), 522-532. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00131-8 4. Cederman, L.-E., Gleditsch, K. S., & Wucherpfennig, J. (2017). Predicting the decline of ethnic civil war: Was Gurr right and for the right reasons? Journal of Peace Research, 54(2), 262-274. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343316684191 5. Dhanabalan, S. (1989). Speech at New Year gathering for community leaders. Singapore. Ministry of Communications and Information (1985-1990). https://www.nas.gov.sg/archivesonline/speeches/record-details/7929bb0b-115d-11e3-83d5-0050568939ad
|
|