OPTIMIZATION OF RADIATION DOSES TO PATIENTS IN X-RAY DIAGNOSTICS

Author:

Okhrimenko Sergei E.1ORCID,Ilin L. A.2ORCID,Korenkov I. P.2ORCID,Morozov S. P.3ORCID,Birukov A. P.2ORCID,Gombolevskiy V. A.3ORCID,Prokhorov N. I.4ORCID,Lantukh Z. A.5,Rizhov S. A.3,Soldatov I. V.3ORCID,Fomin A. A.2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. A.I. Burnazyan Federal Medical Biophysical Centre; State Budget-Funded Health Care Institution of the City of Moscow «Research and Practical Clinical center for Diagnostics and Telemedicine Technologies of the Moscow Health care Department»; Russian Medical Academy of Continuing Postgraduate Education Russian Ministry of Health

2. A.I. Burnazyan Federal Medical Biophysical Centre

3. State Budget-Funded Health Care Institution of the City of Moscow «Research and Practical Clinical center for Diagnostics and Telemedicine Technologies of the Moscow Health care Department»

4. I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Russian Ministry of Health

5. >State Budget-Funded Health Care Institution of the City of Moscow «Research and Practical Clinical center for Diagnostics and Telemedicine Technologies of the Moscow Health care Department»

Abstract

Introduction. The document analyzes the current state of issues of medical exposure of the population using methods of radiation diagnostics. Purpose of research is thr development of approaches to optimization of radiation doses to patients, taking into account radio-succeptibility and radioresistance of different age groups exposed to medical irradiation (MI), forming radiation doses and risks of induction of long-term stochastic effects in these groups. Material and methods. Analysis of factors affecting the formation of dose load approaches to the study of x-ray diagnostics at the present stage. Results. The paper gives a detailed review of modern scientific views on the effect of low doses of radiation, identifies controversial aspects of this problem, including the threshold of stochastic effects. The analysis of the main factors of MI dose formation is carried out. It is concluded that it is formed mainly in the field of diagnostic irradiation, while the restriction (1 mSv) applies only to preventive irradiation. This leads to a lack of systematic approaches to the reasonable limitation, optimization, and justification of diagnostic radiation procedures. The significant part of the dose load was shown to be formed due to unreasonable or erroneous directions to the study. Medical exposure is significantly different from other types - man-made and natural, and the risk of medical exposure competes with the risk of failure of radiation diagnostics. A number of measures aimed at reasonable limitation of medical exposure and reduction of risks of stochastic effects while ensuring high quality of diagnostics are proposed. The proposals are based on the provision to reduce radiogenic risks with increasing age. It is also proposed to develop “practical thresholds” of medical exposure for different age groups. Conclusion. The necessity of correction and approaches detailing on justification and purpose of studies in x-ray diagnostics, taking into account features of irradiated contingents, development on this basis of “practical thresholds” of MI at a priority of quality of clinical diagnostics is established.

Publisher

Federal Scientific Center for Hygiene F.F.Erisman

Subject

Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Pollution,General Medicine

Reference41 articles.

1. Ilyin L.A., Korenkov I.P., Narkevich B.Ya. Radiation hygiene. 5th edition, revised and supplemented [Radiatsionnaya gigiyena. 5-e izdaniye] Moscow: GEOTAR-Media; 2019. 413 p. (in Russian)

2. Romanovich I.K., Stamat I.P., Kormanovskaya T.A., Kononenko D.V. Natural sources of ionizing radiation: radiation doses, radiation risks, preventive measures [Prirodnyye istochniki ioniziruyushchego izlucheniya: dozy oblucheniya, radiatsionnyye riski, profilakticheskiye meropriyatiya]. Edit. by G.G. Onishchenko., A.Yu. Popova. Saint Petersburg: IMG-SPB; 2018. 431 p. (in Russian)

3. Kiselev S.M. Formation of modern methodology of regulation of protection of the population from radon irradiation Gigiena i sanitariya [Hygiene and Sanitation, Russian journal]. 2017 (1): 52–6. (in Russian)

4. Shandala N.K., Korenkov I.P., Kotenko K.V. Novikova N.Y. Global and emergency fallout 137Cs 90Sr [Global’nyye i avariynyye vypadeniya 137Cs 90Sr]. Edit. by L.A. Ilyin. Moscow: Meditsina; 2008. 200 p. (in Russian)

5. Korenkov I.P., Shandala N.K. Lashchenova T.N., Sobolev I.A. Environmental protection during operation and decommissioning of radiationhazardous facilities [Zashchita okruzhayushchey sredy pri ekspluatatsii i vyvode iz ekspluatatsii radiatsionno-opasnykh ob”yektov]. Moscow: BICOM; 2014. 443 p. (in Russian)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3