ALGORITHM OF DECISION-MAKING ON SOCIAL AND MEDICAL PROTECTION IN EMERGENCY SITUATION

Author:

Soloviev Vladimir Yu.1,Demin V. F.2,Krasnyuk V. I.1

Affiliation:

1. A.I. Burnazyan Federal Medical Biophysical Centre

2. A.I. Burnazyan Federal Medical Biophysical Centre; National Research Center “Kurchatov Institute”

Abstract

The aim of the study. The development of decision-making algorithm for decisions on the social and medical protection of people in emergency situations based on risk analysis. Material and methods. The problems and conceptual provisions of risk assessment and decision-making, based on its results, are described concerning the social and medical protection of personnel of hazardous industries and the population in the event of an emergency situation (ES) in which the level of exposure to hazardous factors may exceed the established safety standards. The object of risk assessment and analysis are stochastic (probabilistic) effects of exposure to ES hazard factors. Their main features, which create complex problems in risk assessment and making decisions on protective measures, is the non-specific effects of the hazardous factors’ impact on human health and their possible latency. Results. The first step before decisions on the protective measures should be to identify a high-risk group among people affected by ES, based on the risk assessment. Three variants of decision-making for the high-risk group are considered: 1) financial compensation for risk, 2) medical measures for protecting health and 3) compensation for the realized damage to health. The requirements of the risk assessment methodology are formulated. Discussion. It is shown that the first option can not provide optimal and justified protection of the health and well-being of people in ES. Decisions on this protection are proposed to be based on a combination of options 2) and 3). The choice of the optimal combination depends on the specific situation and development of emergencies, on the success of implementing engineering and organizational protective measures aimed at preventing "doses" of exposure to people of hazardous factors of the emergency above the established safety limits and on the effectiveness and timeliness of medical protection. Conclusion. The choice of the option of making an effective decision on social and medical protection should be based on the detailed risk assessment from the exposure to hazardous factors, including risk assessment in economic indicators.

Publisher

Federal Scientific Center for Hygiene F.F.Erisman

Subject

Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Pollution,General Medicine

Reference30 articles.

1. Rakhmanin Yu.A., Demin V.F., Ivanov S.I. Obshchii podkhod k otsenke, sravneniyu i normirovaniyu riska zdorov'yu cheloveka ot raznykh istochnikov vreda. Vestnik RAMN. 2006; 4: 5-8.

2. Demin V.F., Zakharchenko I.E. Risk vozdeistviya ioniziruyushchego izlucheniya i drugikh vrednykh faktorov na zdorov'e cheloveka: metody otsenki i prakticheskoe primenenie. Radiatsionnaya biologiya. Radioekologiya. 2012; 52 (1): 77-89.

3. Demin V.F., Biryukov A.P., Zabelin M.V., Solov'ev V.Yu. Problemy ustanovleniya zavisimosti doza - effekt dlya ioniziruyushchego izlucheniya. Med. radiol. i radiats. bezopasnost'. 2018; 63 (3): 25-33.

4. Trboevi, V.M. Kriterii riska v stranakh ES. Problemy analiza riska. 2004; 1(2): 106 - 115.

5. Khrupachev A.G., Khadartsev A.A. Professional'nyi risk. Teoriya i praktika rascheta. Tula. Izd-vo TulGU. 2011. 329 s.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3