Comparative characteristics of accounting models

Author:

Poyda-Nosyk Nina,Markush Noemi

Abstract

The relevance of this study lies in the need to investigate evolution of accounting practices and influence of economic, political, and social factors on them over time. Investigating the evolution of accounting practices is essential to gain insight into the historical context of how accounting has adapted to the changing circumstances. This knowledge helps appreciate the foundations of modern accounting and identify the reasons behind current practices. The purpose of this study was to compare the types of accounting models and to consider their impact on the present accounting systems. Among theoretical research methods, which formed the basis of this study, are methods of qualitative data processing and prognostic methods. Key element of the research methodology is the historical-theoretical part, which involves the study of accounting models of different groups of countries, considering the connections and interdependencies between them. It was concluded that the development of accounting models was affected by various factors that lead to distinguishing certain types with their own characteristics: Continental (with strict laws and conservatism); Anglo-American (limited intervention in accounting regulation); South American (adaptation to high inflation and simple accounting system) and Islamic (compliance with religious principles and lack of diversity in accounting). The orientation of the information is different for every separate model. The continental model is intended for state needs and the provision of reports; the Anglo-American model is for the needs of investors, stock market participants and the requests of creditors; the South American one is focused on state regulation and taxation of economic activity; Islamic is for state and economic regulation and religious principles. The study of both the rudimentary state and the modern application of the international accounting system plays an important theoretical and practical role for the development of accounting and taxation area. Practical value of the study is that the research results and discussions enhance better understanding the nature of modern accounting practices, provide insight into how changes in business processes, cultural norms, as well as legal and regulatory frameworks shaped accounting practices and systems

Publisher

Scientific Journals Publishing House

Subject

Pharmacology (medical)

Reference21 articles.

1. [1] Akimova, N.S., Grinko, A.P., Toporkova, O.V., Naumova, T.A., Kovalevska, N.S., Kirilyeva, L.O., & Yanchev, V.V. (2016). Accounting in foreign countries: study guide. Kharkiv: KhDUHT.

2. [2] Bogáth, E. (2018). Harmonization of international accounting systems. Controller Info. VI (1). Retrieved from http://real.mtak.hu/106172/1/ContrInf_beliv_2018-01_01.pdf.

3. [3] Elsiddig, A.I. (2020). The Qualitative Characteristics of Accounting Information, Earnings Quality, and Islamic Banking Performance: Evidence from the Gulf Banking Sector. International Journal of Financial Studies, 8(2), article number 30. doi: 10.3390/ijfs8020030.

4. [4] Eromonsele, E. (2017). Accounting models: a conceptual review. International Journal of Marketing & Financial Management, 5(5), 29-35. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.821844.

5. [5] Evdokimov, V., Legenchuk, S., & Hrycyshen, D. (2012). Islamic model of accounting: basic provisions. Accounting and Auditing, 4, 42-49.

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3