Affiliation:
1. Queen’s University Belfast , Northern Ireland
2. Kozminski University in Warsaw , Poland
3. Cornell University , United States of America , Barcelona Centre for International Affairs (CIDOB) , Spain
Abstract
Abstract
This paper starts with a dilemma. How to ensure the adequate protection of individual health data and privacy in a global pandemic, which has intensified the use of digital applications for the purposes of data sharing and contact-tracing? There is no simple answer to this question when choosing between the protection of public health and individual privacy. However, the history of the existing case-law regarding infectious diseases control, both Polish and European, teaches about numerous examples in which health data and privacy were not adequately protected, but, on the contrary, were misused leading to human rights infringements. In light of this case law and public health ethics, this paper argues radically that the use of digital applications to fight the Covid-19 pandemic has not been sufficiently justified at least in the Polish context. Especially, unconvincing benefits from the use of these tools do not outweigh the likelihood of human rights infringements with far-reaching consequences for political, social and economic rights now and in the future. In its novelty, this article combines a historical-legal method with the concept of public health ethics and a human rights-based approach and to foster further research and discussion. The text also responds to the pressing need to analyze those human rights issues embedded in the Polish reality.
Reference82 articles.
1. Alston P., Does the past matter? On the origins of human rights, “Harvard Law Review” 2013, vol. 126, no. 7.
2. Annas G.J. and Mariner W.K., (Public) Health and Human Rights in Practice, “Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law” 2016, vol. 41, no. 1.10.1215/03616878-3445659
3. Annas G.J., Worst Case Bioethics, Oxford/New York 2011.10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780195391732.001.0001
4. Aplikacja „Kwarantanna domowa” budzi wątpliwości obywateli. Rzecznik pisze do premiera, 13.11.2020, https://www.rpo.gov.pl/pl/content/rpo-do-premiera-aplikacja-kwarantanna-domowa-budziwatpliwosci.
5. Bradford L. Aboy M. and Liddell K., COVID-19 contact tracing apps: a stress test for privacy, the GDPR, and data protection regimes, “Journal of Law and the Biosciences” 2020, vol. 7, no. 1.10.1093/jlb/lsaa034
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献