The Use of Covid-19 Digital Applications and Unavoidable Threats to the Protection of Health Data and Privacy

Author:

Dąbrowska-Kłosińska Patrycja1ORCID,Grzelak Agnieszka2ORCID,Nimark Agnieszka3

Affiliation:

1. Queen’s University Belfast , Northern Ireland

2. Kozminski University in Warsaw , Poland

3. Cornell University , United States of America , Barcelona Centre for International Affairs (CIDOB) , Spain

Abstract

Abstract This paper starts with a dilemma. How to ensure the adequate protection of individual health data and privacy in a global pandemic, which has intensified the use of digital applications for the purposes of data sharing and contact-tracing? There is no simple answer to this question when choosing between the protection of public health and individual privacy. However, the history of the existing case-law regarding infectious diseases control, both Polish and European, teaches about numerous examples in which health data and privacy were not adequately protected, but, on the contrary, were misused leading to human rights infringements. In light of this case law and public health ethics, this paper argues radically that the use of digital applications to fight the Covid-19 pandemic has not been sufficiently justified at least in the Polish context. Especially, unconvincing benefits from the use of these tools do not outweigh the likelihood of human rights infringements with far-reaching consequences for political, social and economic rights now and in the future. In its novelty, this article combines a historical-legal method with the concept of public health ethics and a human rights-based approach and to foster further research and discussion. The text also responds to the pressing need to analyze those human rights issues embedded in the Polish reality.

Publisher

University of Bialystok

Reference82 articles.

1. Alston P., Does the past matter? On the origins of human rights, “Harvard Law Review” 2013, vol. 126, no. 7.

2. Annas G.J. and Mariner W.K., (Public) Health and Human Rights in Practice, “Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law” 2016, vol. 41, no. 1.10.1215/03616878-3445659

3. Annas G.J., Worst Case Bioethics, Oxford/New York 2011.10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780195391732.001.0001

4. Aplikacja „Kwarantanna domowa” budzi wątpliwości obywateli. Rzecznik pisze do premiera, 13.11.2020, https://www.rpo.gov.pl/pl/content/rpo-do-premiera-aplikacja-kwarantanna-domowa-budziwatpliwosci.

5. Bradford L. Aboy M. and Liddell K., COVID-19 contact tracing apps: a stress test for privacy, the GDPR, and data protection regimes, “Journal of Law and the Biosciences” 2020, vol. 7, no. 1.10.1093/jlb/lsaa034

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3