Selected Considerations Regarding the Digitalisation of Criminal Proceedings in Light of the Standards of the Council of Europe: Analysis Taking into Account the Experience of the Current Pandemic

Author:

Karski Karol1ORCID,Oręziak Bartłomiej2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. University of Warsaw , Poland

2. Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw , Poland

Abstract

Abstract The aim of the article is to prepare an analysis in order to formulate propositions regarding the digitalisation of Polish criminal proceedings as regards the administration of justice. These hypotheses would have merited consideration even pre-pandemic, but they demand even more attention as a result of the pandemic. The pandemic has served to highlight the pre-existing necessity to adapt criminal law to the latest observable technical and technological advances. In light of the above, the first issue to be analysed concerns the conditions, procedures, and possibilities surrounding the collection of evidence electronically, taking into account the most recent relevant guidelines of the Council of Europe. The second issue to be examined will be the adaptation of criminal procedures, including Polish, to the standards stipulated in the Convention of the Council of Europe on Cybercrime of 23 November 2001, in light of national norms regarding evidence gathering. The third issue that will be assessed in this study will be the benefits, risks, or potential of the application of artificial intelligence algorithms in criminal procedure. The consideration of each of the three areas will have regard to the present global pandemic. The article concludes with a concise summary containing the authors’ conclusions and propositions de lege ferenda.

Publisher

University of Bialystok

Reference55 articles.

1. André A., The Information Technology Revolution in Health Centre, (in :) A. André (ed.), Digital Medicine, Cham 2019.10.1007/978-3-319-98216-8_1

2. Boni B., Creating a Global Consensus Against Cybercrime, “Network Security” 2001, no. 9.10.1016/S1353-4858(01)00918-7

3. Boratyńska K., M. Królikowski, Komentarz do art. 167, (in) A. Sakowicz (ed.), Kodeks postępowania karnego. Komentarz, Warszawa 2016.

4. Bowrey K., Ethical Boundaries and Internet Cultures, (in:) L. Bently, S. Maniatis (eds.), Intellectual Property and Ethics, London 1998.

5. Bradley C., Intent, Presumptions, and Non-Self-Executing Treaties, “The American Journal of International Law” 2008, no. 102(3).10.2307/20456642

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3