Member States' obligations resulting from wasteful spending funds in the implementation of projects co-financed by EU funds in the light of the EU law. Searching for a common standard for management and control systems

Author:

,Poreżyńska MagdalenaORCID

Abstract

This study aims to verify whether despite the generally formulated obligations in EU law intended to ensure that European funds are spent correctly, it is possible to clearly identify the scope of these obligations, and at the same time specify the standard recommended by the EU for national management and control systems. Author primarily uses the formal-dogmatic method to analyze the relevant EU law, the decision-making practice of the European bodies involved in the protection of EU financial interests, the Court’s case-law and the legal doctrine. Due to the lack of clearly recommended model at EU level while generally formulated conditions (especially those resulting from the Charter of Fundamental Rights) that need to be considered by Member States when designing their management and control systems, it is difficult to ensure that the systems are effective which is crucial for guarantee the protection of EU financial interests. The analysis showed that the problem starts at the source as the implementation of both fraud and irregularity concepts varies across Member States which significantly hinders their correct identification. To assist Member States in implementation of management and control systems, the respective guidelines adopted at EU level summarizing the key requirements applicable to national authorities involved in distribution of EU funds are worth considering.

Publisher

University of Bialystok

Reference33 articles.

1. Cohesion policy in the European Union;Baun;Houndmills-Basingstoke-Hampshire-New York,2014

2. Bobek, M. (2011). Why There Is No Principle of "Procedural Autonomy" of the Member States. In B. de Witte & H. Micklitz (Eds), The European Court of Justice and the Autonomy of the Member States. Intersentia.

3. Borys, K. et al. (2023). Art. 6 In R. Poździk & M. Perkowski (Eds), Ustawa o zasadach realizacji zadań finansowanych ze środków europejskich w perspektywie finansowej 2021-27. Komentarz. Wolters Kluwer.

4. Commission (2022a). Statistical evaluation of irregularities reported for 2021: own resources, agriculture, cohesion and fisheries policies, pre-accession and direct expenditure accompanying the document Commission report to the Council and the European Parliament 33rd Annual Report on the protection of the European Union's financial interests and the fight against fraud - 2021, SWD (2022) 307 final.

5. Commission (2022b). Second report on the implementation of Directive (EU) 2017/1371 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 July 2017 on the fight against fraud to the Union's financial interests by means of criminal law. COM (2022) 433 final.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3