Approval procedure for active substances in plant protection products - doubts of scientific certainty as a source of controversy. Analysis of systemic imperfections on the example of glyphosate

Author:

Gembicka AnnaORCID, ,Farhan Jakub AliORCID,

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to examine the causes of recurring doubts regarding the safety of plant protection products used in the European Union. Plant protection products are a particular subject of regulation. All standards concerning them require prior in-depth scientific research in the field of exact sciences. Achieving adequate safety of humans, animals and the environment in connection to the use of plant protection products requires not only good law, but a law based on representative research and scientific certainty. Bearing in mind the above, the authors undertook an analysis of what seems to be the cause of significant social doubts as to the actual achievement of the purposes of Regulation 1107/2009, i.e. inclusion of scientific research in the procedure of approval of active substances in plant protection products. First, the approval procedure for the active substance of the plant protection product was presented, and then the main shortcoming of the procedure was analyzed on the example of the approval of glyphosate. In the authors' opinion, guidance documents on literature review should be revised to reflect the best scientific practice, and their standards should be enforced, in particular, to ensure that there is no doubt about the objectivity of the literature review.

Publisher

University of Bialystok

Subject

General Medicine

Reference37 articles.

1. Antoniou, M., Habib, M. E. E. M., Howard, C. V., Jennings, R. C., Leifert, C., Nodari, R. O., Robinson, C., & Fagan, J. (2011). Roundup and Birth Defects: Is the Public Being Kept in the Dark?. Earth Open Source. http://earthopensource.org/earth-open-source-reports/roundup-and-birth-defects-is-the-public-being-kept-in-the-dark/.

2. Bellanger, M., Demeneix, B., Grandjean, P., Zoeller, R. T., & Trasande, L. (2015). Neurobehavioral Deficits, Diseases, and Associated Costs of Exposure to Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals in the European Union. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 100(4), 1256-1266. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2014-4323.

3. Buonsante, V.A., Muilerman, H., Santos, T., Robinson, C., & Tweedale, A. C. (2014). Risk Assessment's Insensitive Toxicity Testing May Cause It to Fail. Environmental Research, 135, 139-47. https://doi:10.1016/j.envres.2014.07.016.

4. Clausing, P. (2017). Glyphosate and Cancer: Authorities Systematically Breach Regulations. GLOBAL 2000. Available at: http://www.gmwatch.org/files/GLO_02_Glyphosat_EN.pdf.

5. De Roos, A.J. et al. (2003). Integrative assessment of multiple pesticides as risk factors for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma among men. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 60(9), 11e-111. https://doi.org/10.1136/oem.60.9.e11.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3