COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT BIOSTIMULATORS ON THE GERMINATION AND SPROUTING BEHAVIOUR OF FOUR WHEAT VARIETIES
-
Published:2023-03-23
Issue:4(192)
Volume:55/2022
Page:377-390
-
ISSN:2784-0360
-
Container-title:Journal of Applied Life Sciences and Environment
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:JALSE
Author:
MARTA Alina Elena1ORCID, SLABU Cristina1ORCID, Mihaela COVASA Mihaela1ORCID, MOTRESCU Iuliana2ORCID, JITAREANU Carmenica Doina1
Affiliation:
1. Iasi University of Life Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Plant Science 3, Mihail Sadoveanu Alley, 700490, Iasi, Romania 2. Iasi University of Life Sciences, Faculty of Horticulture, Department of Exact Sciences 3, Mihail Sadoveanu Alley, 700490, Iasi, Romania; Research Institute for Agriculture and Environment, 14, Mihail Sadoveanu Alley, 700490, Iasi, Romania
Abstract
Wheat is an important cereal around the world and is a nutrient source in people’s diets. In this work, we focused on the potential of some biostimulators on four wheat varieties - Dropia, Glosa, Gruia, and Pegasus, with a focus on the effects during the first developing stages from germination to the appearance of the second leaf. Our results indicated that germination and some biochemical traits can be strongly influenced by biostimulants, with the effects also depending on the genetic background of the variety. Some treatments proved beneficial for germination, and also growth as found by the biometric measurements, while others inhibited both traits. Some of the biostimulants increased the concentration of the photosynthetic compounds, thus being recommended for use during all stages of wheat development. Dropia, Glosa, and Gruia reacted positively in most tests, their germination and plant and root development were stimulated by Super fifty, Atonik, Asfac, and Cropmax. Thus, we recommend the use of these biostimulants in the first development stages. The concentrations of photosynthetic pigments increased after treatment with Asfac, Atonik, and Cropmax. The treatment showing the most inhibitory effects was Lebosol.
Publisher
University of Life Sciences in lasi
Reference21 articles.
1. Aectra. Technical information of Atonik from the producer website, https://www.aectra.ro/produs/atonik/ (accessed on 9 March 2023). 2. Ali, Q.; Perveen, R.; El-Esawi, M.A.; Ali, S.; Hussain, S.M.; Amber, M.; Iqbal, N.; Rizwan, M.; Alyemeni, M.N.; El-Serehy, H.A.; Al-Misned, F.A.; Ahmad, P. Low Doses of Cuscuta reflexa Extract Act as Natural Biostimulants to Improve the Germination Vigor, Growth, and Grain Yield of Wheat Grown under Water Stress: Photosynthetic Pigments, Antioxidative Defense Mechanisms, and Nutrient Acquisition. Biomolecules. 2020, 10, 1212. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom10091212. 3. Amin, A.A. Physiological response of wheat plant (Triticum aestivum L.) to foliar application of pix and Atonik. Journal of Agricultural Science, Mansoura University. 2003, 28, 979-993. 4. Batool, Z.; Ishfaq, M.; Akbar, N.; Zulfiqar, U.; Anjum, S.A.; Shafiq, M.; Aziz, A. Exogenous application of Atonik (sodium nitrophenolate) under skip irrigation regimes modulate the physiology, growth and productivity of Zea mays L. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2022.2152011. 5. Bindi, M.; Ferrise, R.; Finger, R.; Fodor, N.; Gabaldon-Leal, C.; Gaiser, T.; Jabloun, M.; Kersebaum, K.C.; Lizaso, J.I.; Lorite, I.J.; Manceau, L.; Moriondo, M.; Nendel, C.; Rodriguez, A.; Ruiz-Ramos, M.; Semenov, M.A.; Siebert, S.; Stella, T.; Stratonovitch, P.; Trombi, G.; Wallach, D. Diverging importance of drought stress for maize and winter wheat in Europe. Nature Communications. 2018, 9, 4249. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-06525-2.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|