Affiliation:
1. Iasi University of Life Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Pedotechnics, 3, Mihail Sadoveanu Alley, 700490, Iasi, Romania
Abstract
During the last decades, no-tillage has started to be used on more and more areas, being a conservative tillage system practiced in many farms in the country. The aim of this study was to quantify the effects of the no-tillage system on the physical properties of the soil compared to the conventional system, in a plateau area with cambic chernozem soil under the current climatic conditions in the north-east of Romania, in order to implement it in agricultural practice of the studied area. The soil samples were taken in natural and undisturbed conditions for bulk density and moisture content, soil penetration resistance was determined using the Eijkelkamp penetrologger. The status of soil compaction, the various porosity categories, and the soil moisture content were all determined based on field and laboratory analysis. Measurements performed at a depth of 0-40 cm showed a lower bulk density in the conventional system, and in terms of variation in values from sowing to harvesting, there was a maximum increase of 18% in the 10-20 cm soil layer, an intermediate of 10% in the topsoil and 20-30 cm layers, and a minimum of 1% in the 30-40 cm layer. Total porosity, which reflects soil pore volume, is inversely correlated with bulk density, which means that under conventional tillage practices, soil macropore volume (>0.05 cm) was higher (47.79-60.82% v/v) than under no-tillage practices (45.90-50.79% v/v) for 0-40 cm depth at the sowing time. The results confirm that the no-tillage system conserves more water in the soil under current climatic conditions.
Funder
European Regional Development Fund
Publisher
University of Life Sciences in lasi
Reference35 articles.
1. Afzalinia, S.; Zabihi, J. Soil compaction variation during corn growing season under conservation tillage. Soil and Tillage Research. 2014, 137. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2013.11.003.
2. Alaoui, A.; Lipiec, J.; Gerke, H.H. A review of the changes in the soil pore system due to soil deformation: A hydrodynamic perspective. Soil and Tillage Research. 2011, 115–16, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2011.06.002.
3. Alskaf, K.; Sparkes, D.L.; Mooney, S.J.; Sjögersten, S.; Wilson, P. The uptake of different tillage practices in England. Soil Use Manage. 2020, 36, 27-44. https://doi.org/10.1111/sum.12542.
4. Amin, M.; Khan, M.J.; Jan, M.T.; Rehman, M.U.; Tariq, J.A.; Hanif, M.; Shah, Z. Effect of different tillage practices on soil physical properties under wheat in semi-arid environment. Soil and Environment. 2014, 33, 33-37.
5. Andrzej, W.; Boguslaw, M.; Anna, S. Effect of tillage system and previous crop on grain yield grain quality and weed infestation of durum wheat. Romanian Agricultural Research. 2014, 31, 129-137.