Author:
Wang Xin-Ying ,Han Min ,Wang Ya-Nan ,
Abstract
For the noisy chaotic series prediction problem, traditional methods are quite empirical, and are lacking in the analysis of the composition of the prediction error, thereby ignoring the the difference between chaotic dynamics reconstruction and prediction model. Based on the composition of actual prediction error, the predictor bias error and input disturbance error are defined in this paper and two kinds of global forecasts, ensemble least-square method and regularization method are analysed. It is shown that the ensemble least-square method is suitable for the reconstruction of chaotic dynamics, but has a greater influence on the predictor error. On the other hand, the regularization method can improve the sensitivity of the predictor, but it can be influenced by the input perturbation error. Two simulation examples are used to demonstrate the difference between the chaotic dynamical reconstruction and the establishment of prediction model, and to compare the ensamble least-square method and the regularization method, and at the same time indicate that the actual prediction error is influenced both by the input disturbance error and by the predictor error. In practice, a balance should be stricken between the two, in order to optimize the model prediction accuracy.
Publisher
Acta Physica Sinica, Chinese Physical Society and Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences
Subject
General Physics and Astronomy
Reference22 articles.
1. Karunasinghe D S K, Liong S Y 2006 J. Hydrol. 323 1
2. Zhao P, Xing L, Yu J 2009 Phys. Lett. A 373 25
3. Molkov Y I, Mukhin D N, Loskutov E M, Timushev R I, Feigin A M 2011 Phys. Rev. E 84 3
4. Leung H, Lo T, Wang S 2001 IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. 12 5
5. Chen D Y, Liu Y, Ma X Y 2012 Acta Phys. Sin. 61 10 (in Chinese) [陈帝伊, 柳烨, 马孝义 2012 物理学报 61 10]
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献