Comparative analysis of water and carbon dioxide injection for the thermohydraulics of an EGS project in Dikili Geothermal Field, Türkiye
-
Published:2023-04-27
Issue:
Volume:
Page:1-1
-
ISSN:0026-4563
-
Container-title:Bulletin Of The Mineral Research and Exploration
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Bull.Min.Res.Exp.
Author:
BENİM Ali Cemal1ORCID, ÇİÇEK Aydın2ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Düsseldorf University of Applied Sciences, Department of Mechanical and Process Technology, Center of Flow Simulation, Düsseldorf, Germany 2. General Directorate of Mineral Research and Exploration of Türkiye, Department of Energy Raw Materials, Ankara, Türkiye.
Abstract
A comparative numerical analysis of the thermohydraulics of an enhanced geothermal system (EGS) project in Türkiye in Dikili area is presented. The fractured granodiorite is modelled as porous media, utilizing the numerically suggested data of other authors for the corresponding hydraulic characteristics. As the heat transmission fluid, two different mediums are alternatively considered. These are the more classical medium, water and the supercritical Carbon Dioxide (sCO2). Transient calculations are performed for a time period of twenty years, comparing the temporally developing results obtained for water and sCO2 with each other. Based on modeling parameters and assumptions, higher production temperatures are observed with sCO2, in comparison to water, implying an advantage for sCO2 usage as a working fluid in EGS. This is accompanied by the further advantage of a lower pressure drop for sCO2. On the other hand, the temperature advantage is relativized by the lower specific heat capacity of sCO2 causing a decrease in the production thermal power. In general, the present re found to be encouraging for a further and more detailed analysis of the employment of sCO2 as working fluid in EGS.
Publisher
Bulletin of the Mineral Research and Exploration
Subject
Geology,Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology
Reference37 articles.
1. Altunkaynak, Ş. and Yılmaz, Y. 1998. The Mount Kozak magmatic complex, Western Anatolia. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research 85, 211-231. 2. ANSYS Fluent. 2018. Release 18.0, Theory Guide. https://www.ansys.com/products/fluids/ansys-fluent. 3. Baba, A., Sözbilir, H., Demir, M. M., Akkurt, G. G., Özşen, A. Y., Şener, M. F., Hancıoğlu, E., Uzelli, T., 2022. İzmir ilindeki jeotermal kaynakların potansiyeli, kullanım alanları, ekonomik ve çevresel etkilerinin belirlenmesi araştırması. Project Report, 194, İzmir. 4. Baehr, H. D. 2005. Thermodynamik. 12th Edition Springer Verlag, 651. 5. Benim, A. C. 1990. Finite element analysis of confined turbulent swirling flows. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 11(6), 697-717.
|
|