Turbulence Modeling a Review for Different Used Methods

Author:

Hami Khelifa

Abstract

This contribution represents a critical view of the advantages and limits of the set of mathematical models of the physical phenomena of turbulence. Turbulence models can be grouped into two categories, depending on how turbulent quantities are calculated: direct numerical simulations (DNS) and RANS (Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes Equations) models. The disadvantage of these models is that they require enormous computing power, inaccessible, especially for large and complicated geometries. For this reason, hybrid models (combinations between DNS and RANS methods) have been developed, for example, the LES (“Large Eddy Simulation”) or DES (“Detached Eddy Simulation”) models. They represent a compromise - are less precise than DNS, but more precise than RANS models. The results presented in this contribution will allow and facilitate future research in the field the choice of the model approach necessary for the case studies whatever their difficulty factor.

Publisher

International Information and Engineering Technology Association

Subject

Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes,Mechanical Engineering,Condensed Matter Physics

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3