Economics versus politics: pitfalls of policy advice

Author:

Acemoglu D.1,Robinson J.2

Affiliation:

1. Massachusetts Institute of Technology (Cambridge, MA, USA)

2. Harvard University (Cambridge, MA, USA)

Abstract

The standard approach to policy making and advice in economics implicitly or explicitly ignores politics and political economy and maintains that if possible, any market failure should be rapidly removed. This essay explains why this conclusion may be incorrect; because it ignores politics, this approach is oblivious to the impact of the removal of market failures on future political equilibria and economic efficiency, which can be deleterious. We first outline a simple framework for the study of the impact of current economic policies on future political equilibria — and indirectly on future economic outcomes. We then illustrate the mechanisms through which such impacts might operate using a series of examples. The main message is that sound economic policy should be based on a careful analysis of political economy and should factor in its influence on future political equilibria.

Publisher

NP Voprosy Ekonomiki

Subject

Economics and Econometrics,Finance

Reference74 articles.

1. Acemoglu D., Robinson J. A. Economics versus Politics: Pitfalls of Policy Advice // Journal of Economic Perspectives. 2013. Vol. 27, No 2. P. 173—192

2. Acemoglu D., Johnson S., Robinson J. A. (2005). The Rise of Europe: Atlantic Trade, Institutional Change, and Economic Growth // American Economic Review. Vol. 95, No 3. P. 546—579.

3. Acemoglu D., Johnson S., Querubín P., Robinson J. A. (2008). When Does Policy Reform Work? The Case of Central Bank Independence // Brookings Papers on Economic Activity. Vol. 39, No 1. P. 351—417.

4. Acemoglu D., Robinson J. A. (2000). Why Did the West Extend the Franchise? Democracy, Inequality, and Growth in Historical Perspective // Quarterly Journal of Economics. Vol. 115, No 4. P. 1167—1199.

5. Acemoglu D., Robinson J. A. (2006). Economic Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy. N. Y.: Cambridge University Press.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3