Affiliation:
1. Lomonosov Moscow State University; Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Abstract
This article continues the discussion about the results and prospects of applying the institutional approach to the study of economic development, which was initiated by R. Kapeliushnikov (Voprosy Ekonomiki, 2019, No. 7—8). The focus is on the balance of interests and ideas in the light of economic growth, the question of the existence and protection of property rights in various social orders, taking into account the role of the state, the characteristics of institutions in the light of the problem of efficient resource usage, the refraction of the theory of social orders through the prism of objects left outside of the study by North, Wallis and Weingast, on the one hand, and Acemoglu and Robinson, on the other hand. An assessment of the adequacy of the conclusions regarding the pan-institutional nature of the North et al.’s approach is presented, as well as directions for the development of research in the context of a new institutional economic theory.
Subject
Economics and Econometrics,Finance
Reference37 articles.
1. Acemoglu D., Robinson J. A. (2016). Why nations fail. Moscow: AST. (In Russian).
2. Andreeva A. A., Ionkina K. A., Sanishvili T. T. (2017). Empirical approach to the comparative analysis of social orders. Scientific Research of Faculty of Economics. Electronic Journal. Т. 9. Vol. 2, pp. 51—71. (In Russian).
3. Buchanan J.M., Tullock G. (1997). The calculus of consent logical foundation of constitutional democracy. In: Nobel laureates in Economics: James Buchanan. Moscow: Taurus-Alfa, pp. 277—444. (In Russian).
4. Grigoryev L. (2017). Two discourses in Russian economic science. Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 9, pp. 135—158. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2017-9-135-158
5. Siegfried J. (ed.) (2011). Better living through economics. Moscow: Gaidar Institute Publ. (In Russian).
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献