Affiliation:
1. Siberian Federal University;
Institute of Economics and Industrial Engineering, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences
Abstract
The article considers the prospects of the domestic timber industry in the context of sanctions restrictions. Based on the data on average annual trade flows for 2018—2020, the potential damage from trade restrictions is assessed. Particular attention is paid to the fifth package of EU sanctions, which contains the most severe restrictions on trade with Russia for a wide range of forest commodities. The potential loss of income for the Russian timber industry from the ban on exports to the EU is estimated at 3.5 billion dollars. The ban on imports from the EU countries may also be sensitive for the industry, but it should not be regarded as fatal. The possibilities of partial replacement of the deficit of products for a considerable list of goods are shown. At the same time, the violation of free trade in forest products because of sanctions becomes a new turn in the spiral of the global crisis, which began in the pandemic COVID-19. Consequently, the damage to countries imposing sanctions on Russia is also significant. The most affected will be the largest RF trading partners in Europe — Finland and Germany, as well as the Baltic States. A sharp increase in logging in the EU against the background of the energy crisis creates an additional opportunity for the Russian timber complex. The reciprocal nature of economic losses, as well as multiple examples of circumventing sanctions in other industries, suggest that the most likely scenario will be attempts to maintain trade relations while formally implementing the imposed restrictions.
Subject
Economics and Econometrics,Finance,General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,History
Reference16 articles.
1. WhatWood (2021). Timber complex of Russia in 2020—2021. LPK Sibiri, No. 2. (In Russian). https://lpk-sibiri.ru/forest-industry/lesnoj-kompleks-rossii-v-2020-2021-godah/
2. Antonova N. E. (2021). National timber industry complex: Changes in spatial distribution. Regionalistica, Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 5—20. (In Russian). https:// doi.org/10.14530/reg.2021.3.5
3. Vaganov E. A., Porfiryev B. N., Shirov A. A., Kolpakov A. Y., Pyzhev A. I. (2021). Assessment of the contribution of Russian forests to climate change mitigation. Economy of Regions, Vol. 17, No. 4, pp. 1096—1109. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.17059/ekon.reg.2021-4-4
4. Glazyrina I. P., Faleichik L. M., Yakovleva K. A. (2015). Socioeconomic effectiveness and “green” growth of regional forest use. Geography and Natural Resources, No. 4, pp. 17—25. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1875372815040022
5. Gnidchenko A. (2022). Plots of foreign trade, No. 16. Moscow: Center for Macroeconomic Analysis and Short-term Forecasting. (In Russian).
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献