Cinderella or princess: Past and present of economic history

Author:

Maltsev A. A.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Lomonosov Moscow State University; Institute of Economics, Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences; University of Picardie Jules Verne

Abstract

The article considers: (a) the main features of the development of economic history (EH) as an academic discipline in the second half of the 20th century; key challenges faced by the EH in the early 2020s. Based on the results of the survey of 147 international economic historians author reveals the most popular methods used by scholars from different local research communities. Special attention is paid to the study of respondents’ perception of the place of EH among other sciences. The analysis has shown that nowadays EH is gradually becoming an interdisciplinary research platform connecting scholars from a wide variety of subject At the same time, these scholars are united not as much by the unity of conceptual views, as by the desire to study EH not for the sake of history per se, but for the sake of finding the origins of modern social and economic challenges. The article also contains the results of a survey of 42 Russian economic historians about the theoretical and methodological assumptions they use and their vision of the problems of studying economic history in today’s Russia. The analysis has revealed that one of the main challenges for the development of the Russian community of economic historians is its high fragmentation, manifested in the lack of methodological consensus, as well as a rather pessimistic vision of future prospects of EH.

Publisher

NP Voprosy Ekonomiki

Subject

Economics and Econometrics,Finance,General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,History

Reference102 articles.

1. Avtonomov V. S. (2020). In search of a human: Essays on history and methodology of economic science. Moscow; St. Petersburg: Gaidar Institute Publ. (In Russian).

2. Acemoglu D., Robinson D. (2015). Why nations fail. The origins of power, prosperity, and poverty. Moscow: AST. (In Russian).

3. Acemoglu D., Robinson D. (2021). The narrow corridor. Moscow: AST. (In Russian).

4. Bakanov S. A. (2008). Insitutionalization of the scientific field “economic history of Russia”: A brief review. Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University, No. 34, pp. 182—187. (In Russian).

5. Bakanov S. A., Medvedev I. A. (2021). Economic history in the topics of dissertations in Russia (1991—2019). Economic History, No. 1, pp. 85—94. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.15507/2409-630X.052.017.202101.085-094

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. PETER THE GREAT AND INTERDISCIPLINARY SYNTHESIS;Moscow University Economics Bulletin;2023

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3