Incentives for process innovations under discrete structural alternatives of competition policy

Author:

Shastitko A.1,Kurdin A.2

Affiliation:

1. Lomonosov Moscow State University; 2 Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (Moscow, Russia)

2. Lomonosov Moscow State University; National Research University Higher School of Economics

Abstract

This study analyzes the incentives for process innovations under different conditions determined by the competition policy for intellectual property rights (IPR) and particular features of markets and technologies. Competition policy is defined by the presence or absence of compulsory licensing, markets are characterized by technological leadership or technological competition. The results of modelling show that the uncertainty engendered by technological competition may lower the intensity of innovative activities, if there are no mechanisms of coordination between participants. Voluntary licensing generally improves social welfare but does not guarantee an increase in innovative efforts. Compulsory licensing can impede innovations due to the opportunistic behaviour of market participants but certain measures of state policy can prevent this negative effect.

Publisher

NP Voprosy Ekonomiki

Subject

Economics and Econometrics,Finance

Reference34 articles.

1. Gavrilov D. (2010). The suppression of unfair competition acts in the sphere of exclusive rights. Predprinimatelskoe Pravo, No. 4, pp. 13—18. (In Russian).

2. Knyazeva I., Voytsekhovich A. (2012). Features of competitive processes, management of innovations and modern trends in the policy of antimonopoly regulation. ECO, No. 12, pp. 78—84. (In Russian).

3. Rozanova N. (2002). Market structure and incentives for innovations. Problemy Prognozirovaniya, No. 3, pp. 93—108. (In Russian).

4. Shastitko A. A. (2015a). The results of the Russian antitrust law and related law enforcement in the area of intellectual property rights relations. Nauchnye Issledovaniya Ekonomicheskogo Fakulteta. Elektronnyi Zhurnal, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 79—94. (In Russian).

5. Shastitko A. E. (2013). Is it worth to protect competition from intellectual property rights? Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 8, pp. 60—82. (In Russian).

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Prinuditel'noe licenzirovanie v farmacii: tekushchee regulirovanie i perspektivy;Вестник Российского государственного медицинского университета;2021-03

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3