Affiliation:
1. Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Abstract
The article examines one of the main indicators of pension adequacy the replacement rate. The importance of using this indicator for pension system management is substantiated. A methodology for determining theoretical and empirical replacement rates is proposed in relation to the peculiarities of the Russian system of compulsory pension insurance. The article presents the results of calculations carried out on the model of the theoretical replacement rate developed by the authors, according to which, in the current Russian conditions, the replacement coefficient for an employee with a median wage and average length of service is more than 40%, which corresponds to the international criteria for the sufficiency of pensions for this indicator. However, with higher wages, for example, equal to the average for Russia and above, there is a lag behind the level of most EU countries. Modeling shows that in 2002—2018, there was an increase in the differentiation of pensions and replacement rates depending on wages. The performed forecast calculations for the period up to 2050 have revealed the following trends: a decrease in replacement rates for recipients of minimum and median salaries, approximate stabilization for average salaries and growth for recipients with high salaries. The article provides a number of examples of using the theoretical replacement rate for the analysis of the pension system in terms of the effect on the level of pensions: participation in the formation of pension savings, valorization, years of the insurance period, etc.
Subject
Economics and Econometrics,Finance
Reference15 articles.
1. Gorlin Y. M., Salmina A. A. (2019). Comparative analysis of international experience in applying pension adequacy indicators. Vestnik Instituta Еkonomiki RAS, No. 5, pp. 114—131. (In Russian).
2. Borella M., Fornero E. (2009). Adequacy of pension systems in Europe: An analysis based on comprehensive replacement rates. ENEPRI Research Report, No. 68. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2033652
3. Draxler J., Mortensen J. (2009). Towards sustainable but still adequate pensions in the EU. Theory, trends and simulations. ENEPRI Research Report, No. 67. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2033677
4. EC (2005). Working together, working better: A new framework for the open coordination of social protection and inclusion policies in the European Union. COM(2005) 706 Final. Brussels: European Commission.
5. EC (2012). The 2012 ageing report: Economic and budgetary projections for the 27 EU member states (2010—2060). Brussels: European Commission. https://doi.org/10.2765/19991
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献