Affiliation:
1. Volgograd State Technical University
Abstract
The article discusses the internal dualism of modern institutional economics, manifested in division of orthodox or mainstream institutionalism (its axiomatics and dogmatics are represented by the Standard Model) and its opposition post-institutionalism. An agenda for promising post-institutional studies is proposed, covering a wide range of discussion issues beyond the Standard Model — from the transition to integrative interpretations of institutions to the introduction of the Evo-Devo-paradigm of analysis of institutional evolution. A reorientation of the transactional analysis from minimizing transaction costs to maximizing the transaction value generated by institutions is proposed. The normocentric paradigm of institutional theory is discussed, considering any forms and trajectories of institutional evolution outside of the evaluation criteria, abandoning the tradition of negative labeling of institutional anomalies. The article demonstrates that in the focus of post-institutionalism there is institutional complexity, which can only be comprehended by overcoming reductionist methodological approaches of the institutional mainstream.
Subject
Economics and Econometrics,Finance
Reference139 articles.
1. Akerlof G. A., Kranton R. E. (2010). Identity and the economics of organizations. Russian Journal of Management, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 107—130. (In Russian).
2. Brubaker R. (2012). Etnicity without Groups. Moscow: HSE Publ. (In Russian).
3. Giddens A., Sutton P. W. (2018). Essential Concepts in Sociology. Moscow: HSE Publ. (In Russian).
4. Kapeliushnikov R. I. (2018). On current state of economics: Subjective semisociological observations. Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 5, pp. 110—128. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2018-5-110-128
5. Kapeliushnikov R. I. (2019a). Population aging phenomenon: Economic effects. Moscow: Institute of Economics, RAS. (In Russian).
Cited by
13 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献