Abstract
This study focuses on the presentation and interpretation of scientific information and data by Slovak creators on the social platform Instagram. Media content presented on social media often becomes problematic, as popular science posts are more in an entertaining than scientific form. It happens that popular science content is presented inaccurately, without deeper context. In addition, scientific misinformation and misleading information appears, which can pose a danger to audience members who trust such information. Science journalism has found its place not only in traditional media, but also on social media platforms, where problematic information on scientific topics goes viral and achieves a high level of user interaction. In an unregulated or under-regulated social networking environment, it is also more difficult for users to discern the credibility and relevance of the information presented, especially when referring to existing scientific studies or authorities. However, data from these sources may be taken out of context, interpreted in a misleading way or accompanied by completely fabricated or distorted conclusions. Such false scientific content undermines confidence in objective science journalism and discredits the work of science journalists. Several digital tools are now available that can help readers distinguish real scientific information from false information. Critical thinking, media literacy and scientific literacy are key skills that can be used to detect manipulative techniques and navigate the issue of false media content. In this paper, we therefore clarify the importance of media, scientific and information literacy skills to help identify misinformation in media content related to science and research.
Publisher
University of Saints Cyril and Methodius
Reference37 articles.
1. BOOTHBY, C. et al.: Credibility of Scientific Information on Social Media: Variation by Platform, Genre and Presence of Formal Credibility Cues. In Quantitative Science Studies, 2021, Vol. 2, No. 3, p. 845-863. ISSN 2641-3337. DOI: .
2. BUCCHI, M.: Of Deficit, Deviations and Dialogues: Theories of Public Communication of Science. In M. BUCCHI, B., TRENCH, B. (eds.): Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology. London : Routledge, 2008, p. 57-76. DOI: .
3. BUNČÁK, J., HRABOVSKÁ, A., SOPÓCI, J.: Popularizácia vedy medzi verejnosťou. Bratislava : Centrum vedecko-technických informácií SR, 2015. [online]. [2023-02-12]. Available at: .
4. BURNS, T. W., O’CONNOR, D. J., STOCKLMAYER, S. M.: Science Communication: A Contemporary Definition. In Public Understanding of Science, 2003, Vol. 12, No. 2, p. 183-202. ISSN 1361-6609. DOI: .
5. CHEE, Y. F., PAUL, K.: Facebook Launches Climate Science Info Center Amid Fake News Criticism. [online]. [2023-02-13]. Available at: .
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献