Abstract
Worldwide, information is needed about the social landscape management as there is no known studies that have documented how climate-smart landscape approaches improve soil and water status. In Sub-Saharan Africa, effective social landscape governance necessitates a certain amount of social capital, including trust and agreed-upon standards. Climate-smart landscapes are key to successful soil and water management but little effort have been made to critically improve effective soil and water resources. The study was guided by the specific objectives, which include examining equitable climate-smart landscapes and finding out the major challenges facing the implementation of climate-smart landscapes. Using "landscape governance" AND "climate smart landscape," 31 papers (31) were obtained from the Web of Science (WOS) and twenty-nine (27) from the Scopus databases using search engines from (1992-2022). On equitable climate-smart landscapes, it was found that multi-stakeholder participation in landscape management is an iterative and changing process that can assist in addressing and resolving disputes as well as facilitating fair negotiation procedures for underrepresented and minority groups. Proper planning and the implementation of a comprehensive planning framework that links various planning activities and decision-making processes are required for landscape approaches to be successful. The major challenges included policies and institutions, financial difficulties in the conservation of natural resources, and socio-economic issues. The novelty from this study is to inform policy makers on climate-smart landscape approaches to ease soil and water management.
Publisher
Asian Research Association
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science
Reference58 articles.
1. B. Arts, (2003) Non-state actors in global governance: three faces of power, Preprints aus der Max-Planck-Projektgruppe Recht der Gemeinschaftsgüter.
2. U. Schneckener (2009) Spoilers or Governance Actors? Engaging Armed Non-State Groups in Areas of Limited Statehood. SFB-Governance Working Paper Series, Berlin.
3. P. Gonçalves, K. Vierikko, B. Elands, D. Haase, A. C. Luz, M. Santos-Reis, Biocultural diversity in an urban context: An indicator-based decision support tool to guide the planning and management of green infrastructure, Environmental and Sustainability Indicators, 11(2021) 100131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2021.100131
4. T.A. Gardner, N.D. Burgess, N. Aguilar-Amuchastegui, J. Barlow, E. Berenguer, T. Clements, F. Danielsen, J. Ferreira, W. Foden, V. Kapos, S.M. Khan, A framework for integrating biodiversity concerns into national REDD+ programmes, Biological Conservation, 154(2012) 61-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2011.11.018
5. T. Tscharntke, A.M. Klein, A. Kruess, I. Steffan-Dewenter, C. Thies, Landscape perspectives on agricultural intensification and biodiversity – ecosystem service management. Ecology Letters, 8(2005) 857-874. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00782.x
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献