An Expert Panel Review of Geotechnical Site Investigation Regulations and Current Industry State of Practice

Author:

Aubeny Charles1,Dutt Rathindra2,Young Alan G.3,Murff James D.1,Gilbert Robert B4,Doyle Earl5

Affiliation:

1. Texas A&M University

2. Dutt & Associates, Inc.

3. Geoscience Earth & Marine Svc

4. University of Texas At Austin

5. Retired Shell Oil Company

Abstract

Abstract The paper describes a joint industry project (JIP) conducted to provide an independent review of the current Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (BSEE) regulations and the American Petroleum Institute (API) standards (including their historical development). The main objective of the JIP was to make recommendations for improving industry's state-of-practice including revising regulations as needed to reflect the best methods for conducting deepwater geotechnical investigations. The study provides a careful review of all regulations applicable to an integrated site investigation required for the foundation design of a permanent floating production system. A panel of experts in offshore geotechnical engineering was assembled to obtain their technical guidance for defining the most appropriate work scope for an offshore geotechnical investigation for a permanently moored production system. The study describes the progress that has been made in site investigation technology (continuous sampling and insitu testing methods) and interpretation of the data since the regulations were initially published. The study also discusses how the current regulations should be interpreted in light of these recent advancements, as applied to the foundation design of suction piles, plate anchors, or driven piles. The expert panel also recommended revising the regulatory text to ensure that best field practices and sound engineering design principles can be employed when designing foundations to be safe and accomplish their intended purpose. The major benefit of the revised regulatory text is avoiding ambiguity between regulators and practicing geotechnical engineers as to what constitutes best practices for conducting a deepwater integrated site investigation. Introduction On December 27, 2001, the Minerals Management Service (MMS) published amended requirements in the Federal Register (30 CFR 250) to address the design of Floating Production Systems (FPSs). The purpose was to incorporate into their regulations a body of industry standards pertaining to FPSs so that system designers would know what is acceptable. Instead of writing their own standards, MMS determined that it would be most efficient and provide the highest level of expertise to the regulatory process if they incorporated the American Petroleum Institute (API) standards. In recent years, practicing geotechnical engineers working on deepwater offshore projects worldwide have found that establishing the scope of an offshore site investigation is often difficult. The difficulty lies in the ambiguity in the regulations leading to a lack of consensus among regulators, certified verification authorities (CVAs), and practicing geotechnical engineers as to requirements for conducting site investigations for deepwater projects. Since the new requirements (30 CFR 250) were published over a decade ago, the practice of conducting deepwater site investigations has dramatically improved. Today, high quality, digital geophysical data is routinely acquired very efficiently with an Autonomous Underwater Vehicle (AUV). The suite of data such as swath-bathymetry, sub-bottom profiles, and side-scan sonar imagery can be interpreted and mapped to provide a clear 3D picture of the seafloor and subsurface geologic/sediment conditions. More innovative site investigation methods have been developed for obtaining large diameter continuous samples (Jumbo Piston Core - JPC), performing continuous cone penetration test (CPT) soundings and combining these data with the geophysical survey data into an integrated geologic/geotechnical model.

Publisher

OTC

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3