Quantifying the Mechanical Specific Energy (MSE) with Differential Wellbore Pressure for Real-Time Well Automation

Author:

Sahood Tariq1,Myers Michael T.1,Hathon Lori1,Unomah Gabriel C.1

Affiliation:

1. Rock Mechanics, Petrophysics and Sample Characterization Laboratory, Department of Petroleum Engineering, University of Houston

Abstract

Abstract Drilling efficiency is the ratio of unconfined compressive strength (UCS) to mechanical specific energy (MSE); this parameter is important for understanding the drilling process and essential for attempts at drilling automation. MSE is a measure of the energy required to remove a unit volume of rock and depends on many parameters, including the rate of penetration (ROP). However, the standard use of MSE is limited in optimizing drilling efficiency because it fails to account for the effect of wellbore differential pressure (wellbore pressure minus pore pressure) on ROP. UCS has an obvious influence on drilling efficiency, but it is difficult and expensive to measure UCS values under differential pressure. To eliminate the need for measurement of UCS, we applied a modified MSE (MMSE), which accounts for the effect of differential pressure. This is performed by multiplying the MSE by the ratio of pore pressure to bottom hole pressure. Bottom hole pressure is calculated from the mud weight and well depth and corrected for frictional losses. The pore pressure is calculated using the hydrostatic gradient. We overlaid resistivity logs from eight wells, which are sensitive to pore pressure, and compared the trends of MSE and MMSE. The MMSE shows better correlations with resistivity data, especially in over-pressured reservoirs, which results in a more accurate prediction of drilling efficiency. In normal pressured zones, the MMSE and MSE values show similar trends. As expected, they deviate from the typical compaction trend lines for the over-pressured zones. The depth and pore pressure data in the over-pressured zones are typically obtained from the drilling record. A higher correlation between MMSE and the resistivity log data occurs in overpressured intervals. The comparison between MSE and MMSE was also tested on historical well data. The calculated MMSE again closely correlates with the resistivity. Therefore, MMSE is expected to predict abnormal pore pressures (overpressure) using the degree of divergence of the MMSE from the MSE values. Also, during underbalanced conditions or indicating a potential kick, the value of the MMSE is less than one. This predicts a large rate of penetration (ROP) and potentially gives an improved method of predicting a kick. In general, the MMSE significantly improves the understanding of drilling rates and pore pressure prediction.

Publisher

OTC

Reference12 articles.

1. Armenta, M. 2008. "Identifying Inefficient Drilling Conditions Using Drilling-Specific Energy." SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. Denver, Colorado: SPE-116667-MS.

2. Detournay, E., and C.Atkinson. 1991. "Influence of pore pressure on the drilling response of PDC bits." The 32nd U.S. Symposium on Rock Mechanics (USRMS)., Norman, Oklahoma.

3. Majidi, Reza, MartinAlbertin, and NigelLast. 2016. "Method for Pore Pressure Estimation Using Mechanical Specific Energy and Drilling Efficiency." IADC/SPE Drilling Conference and Exhibition. Fort Worth, Texas, USA: SPE-178842-MS.

4. How to Predict Formation Pressure and Fracture Gradient;Matthews;Oil and Gas Journal,1967

5. Comprehensive Hydromechanical Specific Energy Calculation for Drilling Efficiency;Mohan;J Energy Resour Technol,2016

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3