The Co-Saline Storage Method: Advanced Modeling to Accelerate Offshore CCS

Author:

Kelly Rose1,Gabriel Creason, C.1,MacKenzie Mark-Moser1,Julia Mulhern2,Scott Pantaleone2,Daniel Tetteh2,Lucy Romeo2

Affiliation:

1. National Energy Technology Laboratory, Research Innovation Center, USA

2. National Energy Technology Laboratory, Research Innovation Center, USA / Leidos Research Support Team, National Energy Technology Laboratory, US Department of Energy, USA

Abstract

Abstract Offshore locations present significant potential for geologic carbon storage (GCS). Key differences and benefits over onshore GCS include locations distal from population centers and abundant, high-quality reservoirs. Yet, offshore GCS projects also face major logistical challenges, such as metocean conditions and more costly operations. Co-saline storage is a proposed concept to defray costs and risks to candidate offshore GCS operations, while leveraging advanced U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), peer-reviewed models to support and expedite implementation. Assessing for co-saline storage potential involves applying custom GCS risk and resource models to identify and quantify opportunities for safe carbon dioxide (CO2) injection into saline reservoirs while concurrently producing from nearby petroleum reservoirs. Co-saline storage allows for reuse of existing infrastructure, data, and project knowledge associated with hydrocarbon production. Offshore GCS efforts to date have focused on either enhanced oil recovery (EOR) or dedicated saline storage. This paper shows how the use of artificial intelligence-informed models, optimized for offshore GCS and infrastructure risk evaluation, can identify co-saline storage prospects and offer economic and operational benefits for offshore GCS. Over the last decade there have been advances in analytical capabilities that combine geo-data science, artificial intelligence, and domain science methods in multi-modeling approaches to improve evaluation and forecasting of risks and resource potential in offshore systems. These peer-reviewed technologies have been integrated into a workflow to assist with identification of locations with existing hydrocarbon production that are suitable candidates for co-saline storage. When used together with commercial data and tools, this geo-data science method can be used by industry and regulators to assess where and potentially how best to configure platforms, wells, and reservoirs to enable CO2 injection into stacked saline reservoirs while producing from existing hydrocarbon plays. This enables strategic reuse of existing infrastructure to defray costs and enable long-term CO2 storage in favorable offshore geologic settings. Ultimately, the co-saline storage approach provides users and stakeholders with data and science-based analyses to inform safe regulatory and operational decisions related to offshore GCS systems. Decarbonization will require a range of approaches to meet domestic and international climate and operational goals. Existing projects and efforts have focused on single-approach efforts (e.g. EOR, pure saline-storage) to demonstrating the economic and operational viability of offshore GCS. This paper offers a strategic modeling approach for assessing co-saline storage potential (Figure 1). The approach incorporates existing offshore infrastructure and economic benefits from ongoing hydrocarbon production and plays to identify safe and viable GCS locations. Figure 1 Conceptual diagrams of co-saline storage concept for offshore system. A) Concept for a single borehole implementation, B) shematic of multiple reservoir co-saline injection concept, and C) shows a multi-lateral co-saline concept. Shown are key elements of the co-saline storage model, i) continuing production from existing petroleum reservoir, ii) injection of CO2 into a separate, additional saline reservoir, shown overlying in the diagram, iii) avoidance of key leakage pathways such as faults or pathways, iv) sealing elements such as salt or shale diapers, confining lithofacies bounding saline reservoir, and v) reuse of existing production infrastructure to enable co-saline injection.

Publisher

OTC

Reference32 articles.

1. Prediction of geomechanical bearing capacity using autoregressive deep neural network in carbon capture and storage systems;Al-Hawary;Heliyon,2023

2. Choisser, A. Mark-Moser, M., Mulhern, J., and Rose, K., 2023, International Offshore Geologic Carbon Storage Story Map, https://edx.netl.doe.gov/dataset/offshore-geologic-carbon-storage-story-map, DOI: 10.18141/1995986

3. DOE/FECM 2022. U.S. Department of Energy, Fossil Energy and Carbon Management, Strategic Vision: The Role of FECM in Achieving Net-Zero Greenhouse Gas Emissions, 2022. www.energy.gov/sites/default/files/2022-04/2022-Strategic-Vision-The-Role-of-Fossil-Energy-and-Carbon-Management-in-Achieving-Net-Zero-Greenhouse-Gas-Emissions_Updated-4.28.22.pdf

4. U.S. Department of Energy, Fossil Energy and Carbon Management;DOE/FECM;Reliable Carbon Transport and Storage: Roles for Artificial Intelligence in Support of FECM RDD&D Priorities,2023

5. Applied machine learning model comparison: Predicting offshore platform integrity with gradient boosting algorithms and neural networks;Dyer;Marine Structures,2022

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Site-Level Carbon Storage Potential Estimation in Offshore China;SPE Symposium and Exhibition - Production Enhancement and Cost Optimisation;2024-09-02

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3