Use of epinephrine in anaphylaxis: a retrospective cohort study at a Swiss university emergency department

Author:

Ehrhard Simone,Gautschi Dominic,Eyb Vicky,Schauber Stefan K.,Ricklin Meret E.,Klukowska-Rötzler Jolanta,Exadaktylos Aristomenis K.,Helbling Arthur

Abstract

AIMS OF THE STUDY: Anaphylaxis is a medical emergency and requires prompt treatment to prevent life-threatening conditions. Epinephrine, considered as the first-line drug, is often not administered. We aimed first to analyse the use of epinephrine in patients with anaphylaxis in the emergency department of a university hospital and secondly to identify factors that influence the use of epinephrine. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of all patients admitted with moderate or severe anaphylaxis to the emergency department between 1 January 2013 and 31 December 2018. Patient characteristics and treatment information were extracted from the electronic medical database of the emergency department. RESULTS: A total of 531 (0.2%) patients with moderate or severe anaphylaxis out of 260,485 patients admitted to the emergency department were included. Epinephrine was administered in 252 patients (47.3%). In a multivariate logistic regression, cardiovascular (Odds Ratio [OR] = 2.94, CI 1.96–4.46, p <0.001) and respiratory symptoms (OR = 3.14, CI 1.95–5.14, p<0.001) were associated with increased likelihood of epinephrine administration, in contrast to integumentary symptoms (OR = 0.98, CI 0.54–1.81, p = 0.961) and gastrointestinal symptoms (OR = 0.62, CI 0.39–1.00, p = 0.053). CONCLUSIONS: Less than half of the patients with moderate and severe anaphylaxis received epinephrine according to guidelines. In particular, gastrointestinal symptoms seem to be misrecognised as serious symptoms of anaphylaxis. Training of the emergency medical services and emergency department medical staff and further awareness are crucial to increase the administration rate of epinephrine in anaphylaxis.

Publisher

SMW Supporting Association

Subject

General Medicine

Reference41 articles.

1. Fischer D , Vander Leek TK , Ellis AK , Kim H . Anaphylaxis. Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2018 Sep;14(S2 Suppl 2):54. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13223-018-0283-4

2. Muraro A , Werfel T , Hoffmann-Sommergruber K , Roberts G , Beyer K , Bindslev-Jensen C , et al.; EAACI Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Guidelines Group . EAACI food allergy and anaphylaxis guidelines: diagnosis and management of food allergy. Allergy. 2014 Aug;69(8):1008–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/all.12429

3. Ring J , Beyer K , Biedermann T , Bircher A , Fischer M , Fuchs T , et al. Guideline (S2k) on acute therapy and management of anaphylaxis: 2021 update: S2k-Guideline of the German Society for Allergology and Clinical Immunology (DGAKI), the Medical Association of German Allergologists (AeDA), the Society of Pediatric Allergology and Environmental Medicine (GPA), the German Academy of Allergology and Environmental Medicine (DAAU), the German Professional Association of Pediatricians (BVKJ), the Society for Neonatology and Pediatric Intensive Care (GNPI), the German Society of Dermatology (DDG), the Austrian Society for Allergology and Immunology (ÖGAI), the Swiss Society for Allergy and Immunology (SGAI), the German Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (DGAI), the German Society of Pharmacology (DGP), the German Respiratory Society (DGP), the patient organization German Allergy and Asthma Association (DAAB), the German Working Group of Anaphylaxis Training and Education (AGATE). Allergo J Int. 2021;30(1):1–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40629-020-00158-y

4. Sampson HA , Muñoz-Furlong A , Campbell RL , Adkinson NF Jr , Bock SA , Branum A , et al. Second symposium on the definition and management of anaphylaxis: summary report—Second National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease/Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Network symposium. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2006 Feb;117(2):391–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2005.12.1303

5. Simons FE , Ardusso LR , Bilò MB , Cardona V , Ebisawa M , El-Gamal YM , et al. International consensus on (ICON) anaphylaxis. World Allergy Organ J. 2014 May;7(1):9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1939-4551-7-9

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3