Long-term development of assisted suicide in Switzerland: analysis of a 20-year experience (1999–2018)

Author:

Montagna Giacomo ,Junker Christoph,Elfgen Constanze,Schneeberger Andres R.,Güth Uwe

Abstract

AIMS OF THE STUDY: The legalisation of assisted suicide is one of the most debated topics in the field of medical ethics worldwide. In countries in which assisted suicide is not legal, public discussions about its approval also encompass considerations of the long-term consequences that such legalisation would bring, for example, how many people will use this option, from what conditions would they be suffering, would there be differences between male and female assisted suicide and which developments and trends could be expected if there were to be a marked increase of cases of assisted suicide over time? METHODS: In order to answer these questions, we present the development of assisted suicide in Switzerland over a 20-year period (1999–2018; 8738 cases) using data from the Swiss Federal Statistical Office. RESULTS: During the observation period, the number of assisted suicides rose significantly: when four 5-year periods (1999–2003, 2004–2008, 2009–2013, 2014–2018) were analysed, the number of assisted suicide cases doubled over each period compared with the preceding one (Χ = 206.7, 270.4 and 897.4; p <0.001). The percentage of assisted suicides among all deaths rose from 0.2% (1999–2003; n = 582) to 1.5% (2014–2018: n = 4820). The majority of people who chose assisted suicide were elderly, with increasing age over time (median age in 1999–2003: 74.5 years vs 2014–2018: 80 years), and with a predominance of women (57.2% vs 42.8%). The most common underlying condition for assisted suicide was cancer (n = 3580, 41.0% of all assisted suicides). Over time, assisted suicide increased similarly for all underlying conditions; however, the proportion in each disease group remained unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: It is a matter of one’s viewpoint whether the rise of assisted suicide cases should be considered alarming or not. These figures reflect an interesting social development but still do not appear to represent a mass phenomenon.

Publisher

SMW Supporting Association

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3