Author:
Kerry Matthew J.,Volken Thomas,Biller-Andorno Nikola,Glässel Andrea,Melloh Markus
Abstract
AIMS OF THE STUDY: Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) indicators are patient-reported outcomes (PROs). PROs are defined as any report of the status of a patient’s health condition or health behaviour that comes directly from the patient, without interpretation of the patient’s response by a clinician or anyone else. Despite Swiss national bodies (FOPH, FMH) recognising the potential of PRO measures (PROMs) for improving the health system, no consensus has yet emerged regarding a generic PROM framework or specific domains for practical uptake. The aim of the present digital Delphi study was to generate a consensual Swiss expert opinion on a generic PROM framework, measurement domains and items from a validated instrument (PROMIS [Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System]) as well as on the role and implementation of PROs in the Swiss healthcare system via PRO consensus statements.
METHODS: A 4-round digital Delphi study was conducted among Swiss PRO stakeholders. A total of n = 21 Swiss PROM stakeholders completed round 1 surveys on the PROM framework. During the stakeholder meeting, n = 11 stakeholders completed round 2 and round 3 surveys pertaining to measurement domains and items, respectively. In-meeting key questions and discussion items were extracted, consolidated into statements and subjected to consensus voting in a round 4, post-meeting survey. Consensus was defined as ≥70% agreement.
RESULTS: Pre-meeting, agreement was reached for the tripartite framework of physical, mental and social health (95–100%). During the meeting, agreement was reached on all seven measurement domains of a generic PROM (PROMIS-29), ranging from 80% (Anxiety, Sleep Disturbance) to 100% (Pain Interference, Depression, Ability to Participate in Social Roles). Consensus was also reached for all PROMIS-29 items, with average domain consensus ranging from 83% (Sleep Disturbance, Ability to Participate in Social Roles) to 100% (Depression). Finally, four post-meeting consensus statements regarding PROs in Switzerland reached agreement.
CONCLUSIONS: A Delphi method can help identify areas of need regarding PROMs in Switzerland. The current study identified a generic PROM as a missing quality indicator for the Swiss national health system’s value. A pre-meeting informational briefing, expert presentations and moderation supported three voting rounds to help identify PROMIS-29 as a PROM framework (round 1), measurement domains (round 2) and items (round 3) as a basis for further validation research. The empirical agreement among diverse stakeholders supports broad consensus towards preliminary feasibility of integrating generic PROMs into the Swiss health system based on content relevance.
Publisher
SMW Supporting Association
Reference22 articles.
1. Erickson P, Patrick D. Health status and health policy: quality of life in health care evaluation and resource allocation. New York: Oxford University Press; 1993.
2. Weszl M, Rencz F, Brodszky V. Is the trend of increasing use of patient-reported outcome measures in medical device studies the sign of shift towards value-based purchasing in Europe? Eur J Health Econ. 2019 Jun;20(1 Suppl 1):133–40. 10.1007/s10198-019-01070-1
3. Teisberg E, Katz G, Deerberg-Wittram J. Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs). In: Rüter F, Biller-Andorno N, Steiger J, and Meier CA. The 3rd Annual Value Based Health Care Symposium. 2021 June 17; University Hospital of Basel, Switzerland.
4. Meier CA. Variations of care and diagnosis as markers for the quality of medical care in Switzerland. Swiss Med Wkly. 2019 Feb;149(0708):w20029. 10.4414/smw.2019.20029
5. Vincent C, Staines A. Enhancing the Quality and Safety of Swiss Healthcare. A national report commissioned by the FOPH on the quality and safety of healthcare in Switzerland. Bern; 2019. doi: https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.22966.04160