Comparison of fuel consumption and recoverable energy according to NEDC and WLTP cycles of a vehicle

Author:

Karamangil M. İhsanORCID,Tekin MerveORCID

Abstract

Since 1997, the NEDC (New European Driving Cycle) has been used to measure CO2 emissions. However, because this cycle is unable to accurately replicate real-world driving conditions, a new procedure has been developed. The WLTP (Worldwide Harmonised Light Vehicles Test Procedure), which is 10 minutes longer and more dynamic than NEDC, has been used since late 2017. In this paper, fuel consumption, CO2 emissions, and energy demand of these two cycles are compared. The vehicle mathematical model was created in a MATLAB program using vehicle longitudinal motion equations for a light commercial vehicle with a diesel engine. The speed profiles of the commonly used NEDC and WLTP cycles were defined in the model, and the fuel consumption, CO2 emission values, and the total energy values required for each cycle were calculated. Furthermore, the recoverable energy potential of the cycle has been revealed. According to the WLTP cycle, the vehicle's fuel consumption and CO2 emission values were calculated at approximately 11% more than the NEDC cycle. The recoverable energy potential is 2.64 times higher in the WLTP cycle compared to the NEDC cycle. Thus, for vehicle designers, it is a very useful tool that can calculate the fuel and CO2 consumption of a vehicle in 100 km according to certain cycles, based on vehicle parameters.

Publisher

Instituto Colombiano del Petroleo

Subject

General Energy,General Chemical Engineering,Geology,Geophysics,Fuel Technology,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Engineering (miscellaneous)

Reference20 articles.

1. Pavlovic, J., Marotta, A., & Ciuffo, B. (2016). CO2 emissions and energy demands of vehicles tested under the NEDC and the new WLTP type approval test procedures. Applied Energy, 177, 661-670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.05.110

2. Dimaratos, A., Tsokolis, D., Fontaras, G., Tsiakmakis, S., Ciuffo, B., & Samaras, Z. (2016). Comparative evaluation of the effect of various technologies on light-duty vehicle CO2 emissions over NEDC and WLTP. Transportation Research Procedia, 14, 3169-3178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2016.05.257

3. Taborda, A. M., Varella, R. A., Farias, T. L., & Duarte, G. O. (2019). Evaluation of technological solutions for compliance of environmental legislation in light-duty passenger: A numerical and experimental approach. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 70, 135-146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2019.04.004

4. Tsokolis, D., Tsiakmakis, S., Dimaratos, A., Fontaras, G., Pistikopoulos, P., Ciuffo, B., & Samaras, Z. (2016). Fuel consumption and CO2 emissions of passenger cars over the New Worldwide Harmonized Test Protocol. Applied energy, 179, 1152-1165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.07.091

5. Pavlovic, J., Ciuffo, B., Fontaras, G., Valverde, V., & Marotta, A. (2018). How much difference in type-approval CO2 emissions from passenger cars in Europe can be expected from changing to the new test procedure (NEDC vs. WLTP). Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 111, 136-147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2018.02.002

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3