EVALUATION OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF UNILATERAL BIPORTAL ENDOSCOPIC DISCECTOMY IN COMPARISON WITH INTERLAMINAR MICRODISCECTOMY IN THE TREATMENT OF HERNIATED INTERVERTEBRAL DISCS OF THE LUMBAR SPINE

Author:

Balan Volodymyr S.ORCID,Fishchenko Iakіv V.ORCID,Kravchuk Lyudmila D.ORCID,Shcheholkov Yevhenii E.ORCID

Abstract

The aim of the study is to conduct a comparative analysis of the effectiveness of the methods of unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy and interlaminar microdiscectomy among patients operated on for herniated intervertebral discs of the lumbar spine. Materials and methods. The study was conducted at the Department of spine and spinal cord neurosurgery of the Regional Clinical Hospital of the Ivano-Frankivsk from May 2021 to August 2022. The sample consisted of 99 patients with intervertebral disc herniation (at the level of L2-L3, L3-L4, L4-L5, L5-S1), including 44 men and 57 women. Criteria for intergroup distribution: group 1 (n = 43) – removal of the intervertebral disc herniation was performed by the method of unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy; group 2 (n = 56) – interlaminar microdiscectomy was performed. Examination methods - VAS (cm), Oswestry questionnaire after 1 month, 6 and 12 months, respectively. Statistical processing of the results was carried out using Microsoft Excel and Statistica 8.0 (StatSoft Inc.). Results. In the preoperative period, the back pain index was 6,9±1,1 and 6,7±1,4 in groups 1 and 2, respectively. In the postoperative period in group 1, the back pain index according to VAS decreased from 6,9±1,1 cm to 1,9±0,5 cm the next day, with positive dynamics remaining during the year of observation of 0,2±0,2 cm, respectively. In group 2, at the time of discharge, the pain index was noted at the level of 3,5 ± 0,9 cm with a gradual improvement to 0,7 ± 0,5 cm. Assessment of the severity of radicular pain in the leg in the postoperative period after 1 month showed a significant improvement in both groups: in group 1 from 7,2±0,6 cm to 0,5±0,5 and in group 2 from 7,8±0,5 cm to 0,5±0,3 cm. Significant differences between observation groups during the last survey was not detected. The duration of the operation when using endoscopic access was lower than during microdiscectomy (35,7±15,2 min (M±SD)) and (45,8±13,7 min (M±SD)), respectively (р≤0, 05). The amount of blood loss was 3,8 times less determined during endoscopic access ((35,4±18,9 ml (M±SD)) and (122,2±90,9 ml (M±SD)), respectively (р≤0,05). The length of stay in the hospital was shorter in the endoscopic discectomy group. Conclusions. The method of unilateral biportal endoscopic microdiscectomy, due to its low trauma, allows the patient to return to an active lifestyle more quickly compared to open microdiscectomy. No significant differences were found according to VAS and Oswestry indicators at the remote stage of observation.

Publisher

State Institution of Science Research and Practical Center

Reference11 articles.

1. Melnychenko, O.P., Yakymenko, I.L., Shevchenko, R.L. (2006). Statistichna obrobka eksperimentalnih danih [Statistical processing of experimental data]: Navchalniy posibnik. Bila Tserkva, 34.

2. Pedachenko, E.G., Polischuk, M.E., Slinko, E.I., Honda, O.M., Hizhnyak, M.V. (2014). Diagnostika ta hIrurgichne likuvannya diskogennih neyrokompresiynih sindromiv hrebta. [Diagnosis and surgical treatment of discogenic neurocompression syndromes of the spine]. Kiyiv, TOV «VIK-PRINT», 484.

3. Barber, S. M., Nakhla, J., Konakondla, S., Fridley, J. S., Oyelese, A. A., Gokaslan, Z. L., Telfeian, A. E. (2019). Outcomes of endoscopic discectomy compared with open microdiscectomy and tubular microdiscectomy for lumbar disc herniations: a meta-analysis. Journal of neurosurgery. Spine, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3171/2019.6.SPINE19532

4. Hikata, T., Ishii, K., Matsumoto, M., Kobayashi, K., Imagama, S., Ando, K., Ishiguro, N., Yamashita, M., Seki, S., Terai, H., Suzuki, A., Tamai, K., Aramomi, M., Ishikawa, T., Ohtori, S. (2021). Risk Factor for Poor Patient Satisfaction After Lumbar Spine Surgery in Elderly Patients Aged Over 80 years. Clinical spine surgery, 34(4), 223 – 228. https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000001101

5. Hwa, Eum, J., Hwa, Heo, D., Son, S. K., Park, C. K. (2016). Percutaneous biportal endoscopic decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: a technical note and preliminary clinical results. Journal of neurosurgery Spine, 24(4), 602–607. https://doi.org/10.3171/2015.7.SPINE15304

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3