Comparison of the cyclic fatigue resistance of ProGlider, PathGlider and One G path-finding instruments-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Comparison of the cyclic fatigue resistance of ProGlider, PathGlider and One G path-finding instruments

Published:2019-04-24 Issue:1 Volume:13 Page:57-60
ISSN:2008-210X
Container-title:Journal of Dental Research, Dental Clinics, Dental Prospects
language:en
Short-container-title:J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects

Author:

Kırıcı Damla Özsu¹^ORCID,Karataş Ertuğrul²,Uygun Ahmet Demirhan³,Doğanay Yıldız Ezgi⁴,Çolak Kezban Meltem²,Arslan Hakan²

Affiliation:

1. Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Akdeniz University, Antalya, Turkey

2. Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Atatürk University, Erzurum, Turkey

3. Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Afyon Kocatepe University, Turkey

4. Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Kırıkkale University, Kırıkkale, Turkey

Abstract

Background. The aim of the present study was to compare the cyclic fatigue resistance of novel nickel titanium rotary pathfinding instruments. Methods. Twenty instruments were selected for each file system. A simulated stainless steel root canal, with a 90° angle of curvature and a curvature radius of 3 mm, was used for cyclic fatigue test of the ProGlider (#16, progressive taper: 0.02‒ 0.085), PathGlider (#15, taper: .03), and One G (#14, taper: .03) instruments. Statistical analyses were performed with oneway ANOVA (P=0.05). Post hoc Tukey tests were used to determine any statistically significant differences between the groups. Results. The ProGlider instruments exhibited significantly more cyclic fatigue resistance than both PathGlider and One G instruments (P<0.001). One G instruments had significantly more resistance to fracture than PathGlider instruments (P<0.05). Conclusion. ProGlider instruments had better cyclic fatigue resistance than PathGlider and One G instruments.

Publisher

Maad Rayan Publishing Company

Subject

General Dentistry

Reference27 articles.

1. A comparison of canal preparation with nickel-titanium and stainless steel instruments

2. An evaluation of nitinol and stainless steel files used by dental students during a laboratory proficiency exam;Himel VT;Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod,,1995

3. [Advantages and limits of nickel-titanium instruments for root canal preparation A review of the current literature];Taschieri S;Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed,,2005

4. Rotary NiTi Instrument Fracture and its Consequences

5. E Kuştarcı, A AN IN VITRO STUDY OF THE EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT TORQUE VALUES APPLIED TO THE NICKEL TITANIUM ROTARY CANAL INSTRUMENTS FOR CURVED ROOT CANAL PREPARATION;Altunbaş DA;Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi,,2015

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Cyclic Fatigue Resistance of Glide Path Rotary Files: A Systematic Review of in Vitro Studies;Materials;2022-09-26