Affiliation:
1. Samara National Research University
Abstract
The linguo-axiological specificity of the English-language dramatic discourse is revealed through the prism of the speechgenre organization of the dialogue. The relevance of the work is due to the appeal to the problems of discursive-communicative linguoaxiology as a scientific direction, which is at the stage of formation of an independent research platform. The reasons for the linguo-axiological loading of the dramatic discourse are revealed, and the author's development of a linguo-axiological model of speech genres implemented within the limits of the British and American dramaturgical dialogue of the 20th and 21st centuries is proposed. The author dwells on five systemic parameters that form the linguo-axiological speech-genre model and substantiates the variants of their communicative manifestation. A sample of the matrix actualization of the proposed model is demonstrated on the example of a specific speech genre “small talk” when it is included in the format of a stylized dialogic interaction. The results of a comparative linguo-axiological analysis of textual realizations of the indicated speech genre are presented on the basis of four spatio-temporal fragments of the English dramatic discourse. The novelty of the study is seen in the fact that for the first time it applied the provisions of the theory of speech genres in the linguo-axiological interpretation of a stylized dialogue. It is concluded that the developed linguo-axiological model provides an opportunity to trace both the poly-aspect dynamics of the linguo-axiological indicators of the speech genre along the time axis, and its nationally marked specificity when updated within the dramaturgical dialogue.
Publisher
OOO Centr naucnyh i obrazovatelnyh proektov
Reference25 articles.
1. Anisimova, T., Chubay, S., Prigarina, N. (2018). Principles of Describing a Private Rhetoric Genres System. In: SHS Web Conf.: The International Scientific and Practical Con-ference “Current Issues of Linguistics and Didactics: The Interdisciplinary Approach in Humanities and Social Sciences” (CILDIAH-2018), 50: 1—5. DOI: 10.1051/shsconf/20185001041.
2. Boromisza-Habashi, D., Reinig, L. (2018). Speech genres and cultural value in the Anglo-American public speaking course as a site of language socialization. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication, 2 (11): 117—135. DOI: 10.1080/17513057.2018.1428765.
3. Chekulai, I. V., Prokhorova, O. N. (2021). Aspects of the correlation of the dichotomy “language” and “speech”, “value” and “evaluation”. Language studies and modern hu-manitarian knowledge, 3 (2): 167—173. DOI: 10.33910/2686-830X-2021-3-2-167-173. (In Russ.).
4. Cherkass, I. A. (2019). Typology of speech genres: flirting as an indirect speech genre. Hu-manities and social sciences, 6: 241—251. DOI: 10.23683/2070-1403-2019-77-6-241-251. (In Russ.).
5. Dementyev, V. V. (2010). Theory of speech genres. Moscow: Znak. 600 p. ISBN 978-5-9551-0409-6. (In Russ.).