Evidential Markers in German Scientific and Popular Science Discourse: Comparative Analysis

Author:

Bodnaruk E. V.1ORCID,Astakhova T. N.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Northern (Arctic) Federal University

Abstract

The purpose of this article is a comparative analysis of evidential markers in German-language texts of scientific and popular science discourse. The novelty of the study lies in the fact that today there are no scientific works devoted to comparing the means of expressing evidentiality in these types of discourse. Evidence markers contain a link to the source of the information. The researchers note that indicating the source of information increases the degree of reliability of the reported information. One of the main characteristics of scientific and popular science discourse is intertextuality, which is expressed with the help of evidential markers that vary depending on the discourse. The material of the study was 5 texts (299 mentions of the source of information) of scientific and 28 texts (281 mentions of the source of information) of popular science discourse in German, dedicated to the problems of the Arctic. As a result of the study, it was found that statements with evidential meanings “direct evidentiality” and “citation” are more common in scientific discourse than in popular science. At the same time, full citations are less common in scientific texts than in popular science ones. The meaning “rumors” as well as fragmentary quoting are rather rare in both discourses. The lowest frequency was found by the value “inferentiality”, fixed only in the texts of popular science discourse.

Publisher

OOO Centr naucnyh i obrazovatelnyh proektov

Subject

General Economics, Econometrics and Finance

Reference27 articles.

1. Aikhenvald, A. Y. (2004). Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University. 452 p.

2. Andreeva, V. A. (2015). Positions of discourse in modern linguistics. Bulletin of the Baltic Federal University named after I. Kant, 2: 7—14. (In Russ.).

3. Andreeva, V. A., Kopchuk, L. B. (2020). Scientific communication 2.0: features of the presentation of scientific content on German-language popular science YouTube channels. Nauchnyj dialog, 12: 9—25. DOI: 10.24224/2227-1295-2020-12-9-25. (In Russ.).

4. Arutyunova, N. D. (1998). Discourse. In: Linguistics. The Great Encyclopedic Dictionary. Moscow: The Great Russian Encyclopedia. 136—137. ISBN 5-85270-307-9. (In Russ.).

5. Astakhova, T. N. (2015). The field structure of evidentiality in the German media discourse. PhD Diss. Arkhangelsk: SAFU. 234 p. (In Russ.).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3