Affiliation:
1. Vyatka State University
Abstract
The article discusses the phenomenon of categorical perception, the success of which the author suggests can be expressed by the formula “this is exactly X from the category ‘X’.” The lexemes ‘neopredeljonnyj’ [indefinite] vs. ‘neulovimyj’ [elusive] are considered as units that verbalize the subject’s categorization difficulties in perception. Based on a comparison of the use of the adjectives ‘neopredeljonnyj’ [indefinite] vs. ‘neulovimyj’ [elusive] with nominations of different types of perceptual perception, it is established in which cases the object of perception, causing categorization difficulties, is designated as ‘neopredeljonnyj’ [indefinite] X and in which cases it is designated as ‘neulovimyj’ [elusive] X. The study is carried out using methods of definitional, componential, distributive, and contextual analysis based on explanatory dictionaries and data from the Russian National Corpus. As a result of the analysis of linguistic material, it was revealed that the combination ‘neopredeljonnyj’ [indefinite] X denotes that a certain X is well perceived by the sense organs, but the subject is unaware (it is absent from their lexicon) of the designation for this X. The combination ‘neulovimyj’ [elusive] X denotes that the sense organs only register the presence of a certain X, while X manifests itself too quickly/weakly or is heterogeneous, making it unrecognizable.
Publisher
OOO Centr naucnyh i obrazovatelnyh proektov
Subject
General Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Reference27 articles.
1. Akimova, O. B. (1999). Semantics of the unknown and means of its expression in the Russian language. Author’s abstract of Doct. Diss. Moscow. 37 p. (In Russ.).
2. Anufrieva, A. A., Dagaev, N. I., Gorbunova, E. S. (2022). Categorization as auniversal pro-cess: the role of categories in perceptual processes and the formation of actions. Sibe-rian Psychological Journal, 83: 6—19. DOI: 10.17223/17267080/83/1. (In Russ.).
3. Berezina, O. A. (2016). Personal space and perceptual space as structure-forming factors. Studia Linguistica (St. Petersburg), XXV: 13—21. (In Russ.).
4. Bernasconi, B. (2023). Polyfunctional particles in spoken Russian: The case of čto li. Journal of Pragmatics, 208: 77—90. DOI: 10.1016/j.pragma.2023.02.008.
5. Boldyrev, N. N., Dubovitskaya, E. Y. (2006). Cognitive mechanism of meaning formation “Approximation” (based on the material of modern English). Questions of cognitive linguistics, 1: 55—60. (In Russ.).