Appellative Constructions with Epistemic Modality Predicates

Author:

Ioanesyan E. R.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Institute of Linguistics of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Abstract

The object of the study is parenthetical constructions, represented in the language by three types — modal, reflexive and appellative. Modal introductory constructions denote the modal status of a proposition. In reflexive introductory constructions, epistemic units act as reflection marking. Appellative introductory constructions have an illocutionary function — the function of influencing the addressee. The purpose of this article is to analyze appellative constructions with epistemic predicates — one of the subclasses of propositional attitude predicates, verbs of knowledge, perception and opinion. The relevance of the study is due to the fact that epistemic predicates play an important role in the processes of communication and argumentation. The results of a comparative analysis of appellative constructions in several languages — Russian, Polish, Bulgarian, Ukrainian, German, English, Italian, Spanish and Portuguese are presented. Particular attention is paid to the comparison of matrix constructions with epistemic predicates, that is, constructions with a dependent clause, and appellative constructions with these predicates. The analysis of translations of foreign texts with matrix constructions into Russian made it possible to conclude that there is a tendency to replace the original matrix constructions with introductory ones, and vice versa, the analysis of translations of texts from Russian with introductory constructions indicates a tendency to replace them with matrix ones.

Publisher

OOO Centr naucnyh i obrazovatelnyh proektov

Subject

General Economics, Econometrics and Finance

Reference32 articles.

1. Anscombre, J. C. (1985). Grammaire traditionnelle et grammaire argumentative de la concession. Revue internationale de philosophiye, 39(4): 333—349.

2. Anscombre, J. C., Ducrot, O. L. (1976). L’argumentation dans la langue. Langages, 42: 5—27.

3. Apresyan, Yu. D. (1993). Synonymy of mental predicates: counting group. In: Logical analy-sis of language: mental actions. Moscow: Nauka. 7—22. (In Russ.).

4. Apresyan, Yu. D. (1995). Selected works, 2 Integral description of the language and system lexicography. Moscow: School Languages of Russian Culture. 767 p. ISBN 5-88766-045-7. (In Russ.).

5. Apresyan, Yu. D. (2001). System-forming meanings ‘know’ and ‘count’ in the Russian. Russian in Scientific Coverage, 1: 5—26. (In Russ.).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3