Discourse Markers in Works of Russian Linguists: Functional-Pragmatic and Functional-Semantic Approaches

Author:

Kuleshova A. V.1ORCID,Slastnikova T. V.2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Higher Language Training Courses of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation

2. Moscow City University

Abstract

This article addresses the issue of discourse markers as illuminated by the works of Russian scholars. The relevance of the study is justified by the necessity of theoretical understanding of existing scientific approaches to the examination of these linguistic units. A review of scholarly works from the XX—XXI centuries is conducted. Key positions in the interpretation of discourse markers within linguistic approaches such as functional-pragmatic and functional-semantic are characterized. Attention is given to aspects of studying this linguistic phenomenon, such as terminological nomination and belonging to a language class or category. The functions of discourse markers in each of the identified approaches are discussed in the article. The polyfunctionality of individual discourse markers is noted. The results of a comparative analysis of current typologies and classifications are presented. As a result, the authors conclude on the necessity of classifying discourse markers based on several indicators of these linguistic units. The predominance of the functional-pragmatic approach in discourse marker research is acknowledged. The unresolved issue of terminological nomination is recognized. The potential for further research in the field of discourse markers from the perspective of other approaches is highlighted.

Publisher

OOO Centr naucnyh i obrazovatelnyh proektov

Reference48 articles.

1. Artyukhova, I. S. (2016). Axiological foundations of the conceptual analysis of educational discourse. Universum: psychology and education, 9 (27): 7—10. (In Russ.).

2. Avakova, M. L. (2017). The gender aspect of the functioning of discursive elements in English-speaking linguoculture (based on the material of interview discourse and artistic discourse). PhD Diss. Pyatigorsk. 210 p. (In Russ.).

3. Baranov, A. N. (1993). A guide to discursive words of the Russian language. Moscow: Pomovsky and Partners. 207 p. (In Russ.).

4. Beilinson, L. S. (2008). Discursive formulas of professional speech. Izvestiya Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta, 5: 42—46. (In Russ.).

5. Bogdanova-Beglaryan, N. V. (2019). One in the field is not a warrior: on the “magnetism” of pragmatic markers in Russian oral speech. Socio- and psycholinguistic studies, 7: 14—19. (In Russ.).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3