Rhetorical Risk Zones in Mediatexts of Turbulent Times

Author:

Morina L. A.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Novosibirsk State Technical University

Abstract

The concept of rhetorical risk is introduced and actualized within the framework of the rhetorical decoding of the text concept aimed at studying the mechanisms of effective text formation. The phenomenon of textual effectiveness gains particular significance in turbulent periods of human existence. The research material consists of a corpus of mediatexts created during the COVID-19 pandemic and in April 2024 during the devastating flooding in the Southern Urals and Western Siberia. The aim of the article is to identify the zones of rhetorical risks in the text and to identify their indicators. In accordance with the methodological principles of linguorhetorical reconstruction, the zones of rhetorical risks in the text were identified as inventive, dispositival, and elocutive. Indicators of the inventive zone include the implicitness of the speaker’s practical goal-setting   and   the   orthodoxy of the thesis put forward. Indicators of dispositival risk zones include one-dimensionality of argumentation, excessive use of statistical data as arguments, and frequency of related reasoning. The elocutive zone of rhetorical risks arises due to the speakers’ neglect of such a significant communicative criterion for turbulent times as dialogism. The research results can have broad professional applications — from educational activities to mass media and linguo-expert practices.

Publisher

OOO Centr naucnyh i obrazovatelnyh proektov

Reference23 articles.

1. Anisimova, T. V., Gimpelson, E. G. (2004). Modern business rhetoric. Moscow: MPSI. 432 p. ISBN 5-89502-632-H. (In Russ.).

2. Bezmenova, N. A. (1991). Essays on the theory and history of rhetoric. Moscow: Nauka. 215 p. ISBN 5-02-011087-6. (In Russ.).

3. Duskaeva, L. R. (2019). Vectors of praxiological analysis in media linguistics. Media linguistics, 6 (1): 4—18. DOI: 10.21638/spbu22.2019.101. (In Russ.).

4. Golyshkina, L. A. (2020). Decoding Rhetoric: Theoretical and Methodological Substantiation of the Scientific Direction. Nauchnyi dialog, 5: 9—24. https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2020-5-9-24 (In Russ.).

5. Gordon, D. (1985). Postulates of speech communication. In: New in foreign linguistics. Linguistic pragmatics, XVI. Moscow: Progress. 276—306. (In Russ.).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3