Concept of PRIDE in Comic Discourse: Axiological Approach

Author:

Bochkarev A. I.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Novosibirsk State Technical University

Abstract

This article examines the peculiarities of the actualization of the concept of PRIDE within comic discourse from the perspective of axiological linguistics. It determines the value status of the phenomenon under consideration based on an analysis of definitions from dictionaries spanning various years and relevant literature. The study demonstrates the evolution of attitudes toward pride and arrogance within English-speaking linguistic culture. It explores the concept’s connections with related phenomena such as arrogance, vanity, and snobbery. A four-step axiological analysis is conducted to investigate the features of the actualization of the concept of PRIDE in comic discourse. The research material comprises over 70 stand-up comedy performances and 700 episodes of situational comedies. It is established that the textual actualization of the category of pride or arrogance is typically accompanied by audience laughter or off-screen laughter. The study reveals that ridicule is directed at an inflated or unwarranted self-assessment of greatness and a sense of superiority over others. Three primary types of superiority are distinguished: intellectual, physical, and social. Furthermore, it is noted that pride/arrogance is evaluated negatively either through the outcomes it produces or through the demonstration of its unwarranted manifestations. The main linguistic means for actualizing the concept of PRIDE are identified. Thus, self-assessment of greatness is realized through hyperbolization of one’s abilities, while the sense of superiority over others is represented through various linguistic devices.

Publisher

OOO Centr naucnyh i obrazovatelnyh proektov

Reference20 articles.

1. Aristotle. Nicomachean ethics. Available at: http://www.civisbook.ru/files/File/Aristotel. Nikomakhova.pdf (accessed 10.06.2024). (In Russ.).

2. Attardo, S. (2001). Humorous texts: a semantic and pragmatic analysis. New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 238 p. ISBN 311017068X.

3. Brower, R. A. (1963). Light and Bright and Sparkling: Irony and Fiction in Pride and Prejudice. In: Jane Austen: A Collection of Critical Essays. New Jersey: Englewood Cliffs. 62—75.

4. Brown, C. (2005). Out With the Old Deadly Sins, In With the New. Scotsman (Edinburgh), February 7.

5. Brown, J. P. (1979). Jane Austen’s novels Social change and literary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 185 p.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3