Strategies for the Mediatization of Legal Concepts in Russian Mass Media of XXI Century (Concept LEGITIMACY)

Author:

Kondratyeva O. N.1ORCID,Ignatova Yu. S.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Kemerovo State University

Abstract

The role of mass media in the processes of interpretation and assessment of various fragments of reality is discussed in the article. The problem of the entry of legal concepts into the media discourse is raised and the task is set to study the changes occurring in this process, which ultimately lead to the formation of new conceptual units — media concepts. The designated task is solved in the process of analyzing one of the key legal concepts LEGITIMACY. It has been demonstrated that the Russian mass media significantly modify each of the three components of the legal concept, that is, the media virus is “implanted” into the conceptual, figurative and value layers. It allows us to speak of three strategies of mediatization: definitional, metaphorical and evaluative. It is shown that the definitional strategy contributes to the emergence of new features in the conceptual layer of the LEGITIMACY concept (‘trust’, ‘approval’, ‘support’, ‘respect’, ‘fairness’, ‘the phenomenon of consciousness’ and ‘subjective feeling’). It is noted that the metaphorical strategy additionally forms such linguo-culturally specific features as ‘defectiveness’ and ‘object of political manipulation’, the evaluative strategy gives the positively perceived concept of LEGITIMACY a negative connotation (conceptual signs of ‘doubtfulness’ and ‘imaginary’ develop), which is an alarming marker reflecting the current situation in Russian society. It is pointed out that the recorded changes indicate the importance of the discursive factor in the study of concepts.

Publisher

OOO Centr naucnyh i obrazovatelnyh proektov

Subject

General Medicine

Reference17 articles.

1. Cap, P. (2005). Language and legitimization: Developments on the proximization model of political discourse analysis. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics, 1: 7—36.

2. Doudaki, V. (2015). Legitimation Mechanisms in the Bailout Discourse. Javnost — The Public, 22 (1): 1—17. DOI:10.1080/13183222.2015.1017284.

3. Golubeva, T. M. (2016). Linguistic parameters of the strategy of legitimization of the European Union and delegitimization of B. al-Assad in the British political discourse. Bulletin of the Saratov University. New episode. Series: Philology. Journalism, 16 (4): 392—396. (In Russ.).

4. Klushina, N. I. (2014). Mediatization of modern culture and Russian national style. Russkaya rech, 1: 66—73. (In Russ.).

5. Kolmogorova, A. V. (2018). Legitimization as a sociopolitical phenomenon and object of discourse analysis. Politicheskaya lingvistika, 1 (67): 33—40. (In Russ.).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3