Affiliation:
1. Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations, Russian Academy of Sciences
Abstract
The article is devoted to the analysis of the political process of Germany’s abandonment of nuclear energy. The results of a comparative analysis of government decisions taken over the course of one decade, but different in nature and having different consequences for the nuclear industry are presented in the paper. Special attention is paid to the issue of interaction between the government and energy companies in the context of the decisions of 2002 and 2011. It is shown that the abandonment of atomic energy in 2002 was a compromise solution, taking into account both the political desire of society to stop the operation of the nuclear power plant, and the economic interests of energy concerns. The author analyzes the consequences of the unilateral decision of the FRG government in 2011, infringing on the interests of the nuclear lobby, which led to many years of litigation that ended in favor of energy concerns. A review of the final compromise agreements between the companies and the government governing the issue of fair compensation for the early shutdown of nuclear power plants was carried out. Based on a comparative analysis of the two decisions on Germany’s withdrawal from nuclear energy and their consequences, it is concluded that, when entire industries are closed for political reasons, consultations with the involvement of all interested parties are necessary to work out an acceptable compromise.
Publisher
OOO Centr naucnyh i obrazovatelnyh proektov
Reference19 articles.
1. Bernasconi-Osterwalder, N., Brauch, M. D. (2014). The State of Play in Vattenfall v. Germany II: Leaving the German public in the dark. In: The International Institute for Sustainable Development Briefing Note. December 2014.
2. Chassot, S. (2014). Sustainable? A cross-country analysis of the socio-political acceptance of the nuclear phase out in Germany and Switzerland focusing on opportunities for strategic influence. Betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung Und Praxis, 66 (3): 247—265.
3. Cho Il Hyun. (2020). To escape or embrace reactors? The politics of nuclear phase-out in Germany and South Korea In: The Pacific Review. 27. DOI: 10.1080/09512748.2020.1806341.
4. Glushkova, I. V. (2015). Prospects for an energy strategy in Germany. Proceedings of higher educational institutions. Energy problems, 3—4: 42—50. (In Russ.).
5. Huß, C. (2014). Energy transition by conviction or by surprise? Environmental policy from 2009 to 2013. German Politics, 23 (4): 430—445. DOI: 10.1080/09644008.2014.953068.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献