Dose Assessment of the Rectum during Brachytherapy of the Cervix Using Gafchromic Films

Author:

Avevor J.1,Tagoe S. N. A2,Amuasi J. H.3,Fletcher J. J.4,Shirazu I.1

Affiliation:

1. University of Cape Coast, School of Agriculture and Physical Sciences Faculty of Physical Sciences, Department of Physics, Cape coast, Ghana

2. National Centre of Radiotherapy and Nuclear Medicine, Department of Medical Physics, Korle-Bu Teaching Hospital, Accra Ghana

3. Graduate School of Nuclear and Allied Sciences, University of Ghana, Legon, Ghana

4. Ghana Atomic Energy Commission, Radiological and Medical Sciences Research Institute, Medical Radiation Physics Centre, Accra, Ghana

Abstract

Internal radiation therapy, refers to as brachytherapy, involve putting a source of radiation with high photon in or near a cancerous tissues. The type of brachytherapy used most often to treat cervical cancer is known as intracavitary brachytherapy. Unfortunately however, the radiation source placed in the cervix irradiate the normal tissues of rectum and other nearby organs during intracavitary brachytherapy of the cervix treatment. This high doses received by parts of the rectum is a concern for clinicians and the general public. The aim of this study is to assess the dose delivered to the rectum using Gafchromic films and compare it with the optimized dose calculated by the Brachy Prowess 4.60 Treatment Planning System (TPS) reports for empirical validation and system verification. Fletcher suite applicators were used to perform thirty (30) different clinical insertions on the constructed cervix phantom and results evaluated. The mean difference between the doses calculated by the TPS and the doses measured by the Gafchromic film for the rectum at the distance of 0.5cm from the edges of the film was 23.1% (range -42.42 to +40.41). At a distance of 1.5cm for the rectum the mean was 22.5% (range -49.45 to +46.48). The TPS calculated maximum dose was typically higher than the measured maximum dose. However, in some cases, the measured doses were found to be higher than the doses calculated by the TPS. This is due to positional inaccuracies of the sources during treatment planning. It is recommended that in vivo dosimetry should be performed in addition to computation.

Publisher

Technoscience Academy

Subject

General Medicine

Reference27 articles.

1. AAPM Report (1997) Code of practice for brachytherapy physics. Radiation Therapy committee Task Group No. 56

2. AAPM Report No. 63(1998), Radiochromic Film Dosimetry Recommendations of AAPM. Radiation Therapy Committee. Task Group No. 55:6-9.

3. Abdel-Rahman W., SeuntjensJ. P., Verhaegen F., DebloisF. and Podgorsak E. B.,(1995) Validation of Monte Carlo calculated surface doses for megavoltage photon beams, Med. Phys. 32: 286-298

4. Attix, F.H. (1998) Introduction to Radiological Physics and Radiation Dosimetry, Wiley, New York.

5. Bentel, G.C., (1996) Radiation Therapy Planning, McGraw-Hill, New York.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3