CFD Simulation for Heat Transfer In Blast Furnace
-
Published:2020-04-01
Issue:
Volume:
Page:351-361
-
ISSN:2394-4099
-
Container-title:International Journal of Scientific Research in Science, Engineering and Technology
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:IJSRSET
Author:
Vatsala. K Baby1, L Balasubramanyam.2
Affiliation:
1. M.Tech Student, CAD/CAM, Department of Mechanical Engineering, PVKK Institute of Technology, Ananthapuramu, Andhra Pradesh, India 2. HOD & Associate Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering, PVKK Institute of Technology, Ananthapuramu, Andhra Pradesh, India
Abstract
Iron blast furnace is used in the metallurgical field to extract molten pig iron from its ore through a reduction mechanism. The furnace is a vertical shaft with circular cross section. It has five main parts: stack, belly, bosh, tuyeres and hearth. Amongst these regions, hearth is the most important one for the asset life of a furnace. Erosion of refractory lining of the hearth reduces the furnace’s campaign life. So it is necessary to understand the interactions occurring between the slag, molten metal and the refractories. But the severe operating conditions and very high temperature inside the hearth make it impossible to practically observe the processes taking place within it. In order to overcome this problem, the hearth is modeled by using various Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) soft-wares such as ANSYS Fluent, ANSYS-CFX, FLUENT for CATIA V5, ANSYS CFD-Flo etc. The numerical model is then supplied with data which are already known from practical situations as boundary conditions. Proper physical properties of the materials are also used as input. The software runs several simulations and provides us with the result that can validate the experimental observations up to the most accurate level. In this study, temperature distribution profile inside a blast furnace hearth has been shown by modeling a simple hearth with the help of ANSYS 15.0 Workbench. The model is simulated by changing some parameters and making several assumptions. The discrepancy in the calculated and the observed temperature opens up new scope for further improvement.
Publisher
Technoscience Academy
Reference18 articles.
1. Ahindra Ghosh, Amit Chatterjee, IRONMAKING and STEELMAKING 2. P K Nag, Heat and Mass Ttransfer Shan-Wen Du, Wei-Hsin Chen, John A. Lucas, “Pulverized coal burnout in blast furnace simulated by a drop tube furnace”, Energy 35 (2010) 576-581. 3. P K Iwamasa, G A Caffery, W D Warnica, S R Alias, “Modelling of Iron Flow, Heat Transfer and Refractory Wear in the Hearth of an Iron Blast Furnace”, Inter Conf on CFD in Mineral & Metal Processing and Power Generation, CSIRO 1997. 4. Shinroku MATSUZAKI, Akihiko SHINOTAKE, Masaaki NAITO, Tsunehisa NISHIMURA, Kazuya KUNITOMO, Takashi SUGIYAMA, “Development of Mathematical Model of Blast Furnace”, NIPPON STEEL TECHNICAL REPORT No. 94, JULY 2006 5. Vladimir PANJKOVIC and John TRUELOVE, “Computational Fluid Dynamics Modelling of Iron Flow and Heat Transfer in the Iron Blast Furnace Hearth”, Second International Conference on CFD in the Minerals and Process Industries, CSIRO, Melbourne, Australia, 6-8 December 1999
|
|