Affiliation:
1. Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Faculty of Science, Taif University, KSA, Saudi Arabia
Abstract
This work approaches the problem of knowledge extraction within the banking domain using rough set, rough set theory can be considered as a topological method. Our main goal is to separate of the accounting attributes to discriminate between Islamic, mixed, and conventional banks. To this end, we have used the positive region in the rough set framework is traditional uncertainty measurements, used usually as in attribute reduction. Attributes banks will be separated and we are classified with a given decision, then we theoretically analyze the variance of the rough set. In the actual application, we used the financial semantics based on the domain expertise of experts to determine between the competing approaches. The results show the value of shared financial information for distinguishing between the three types of banks with certain attributes. These results are helping us offer a new view of attribute reduction in knowledge. We used MATLAB for our applications in computing.
Reference18 articles.
1. Beck, T.; Demirgüç-Kunt, A.; Merrouche, O. (2013) Islamic vs. conventional banking: Business model, efficiency and stability. Journal of Banking and Finance. 37, 433–447.
2. Islamic vs. conventional banking: Business model, efficiency and stability
3. Ben Ishak Anis; Feki Asma. (2016) A discriminating study between three categories of banks based on statistical learning approaches. Intelligent Data Analysis. 20, 1199-1221. https://doi.org/10.3233/ida-160863
4. Ben Othman, H.; Mersni, H. (2014) The use of discretionary loan loss provisions by Islamic banks and conventional banks in the Middle East region: A comparative study. Studies in Economics and Finance. 31, 106–128.
5. Dar, H. A.; Presely, R.J. (2000) Lack of profit loss sharing in Islamic banking: Management and control imbalances, Economic research paper N? 00/24, Department of Economics, Southborough University. 2000.