Author:
Dr. Michail St. Fountoulakis
Abstract
This article explores implementing a tiered education program during the final year of a four-year training cycle for cadets in police and military academies. The program aims to optimize cadet training by addressing individual strengths and needs through a comprehensive assessment framework, with a specific focus on English as a Second Language (ESL) and English for Specific Purposes (ESP). This research, based on teaching experiences at the Hellenic Police Officers School and Hellenic Army Academy, as well as data from the Polish Naval Academy and the University of Defence of the Czech Republic, investigates the benefits and challenges of this approach. The study includes over 500 cadets from different academies. A mixed-methods approach was used: quantitative data from standardized assessments and performance metrics, and qualitative data from surveys and interviews with cadets and instructors. This enabled a comprehensive evaluation of the tiered program's impact on cadet performance and preparedness. The central research question is: How can a tiered education program enhance cadet training in police and military academies without being discriminatory? Findings show significant improvements in cadet performance and preparedness, with considerations for fairness and inclusivity. Potential biases in the assessment process were mitigated using robust criteria and continuous evaluations to maintain transparency and equity. Ethical considerations, including anonymization and confidentiality of participant data, were strictly adhered to. The discussion highlights practical implications, limitations, and future research dimensions, suggesting that this project could be expanded to further enhance training programs in both police and military education contexts.
Reference14 articles.
1. Army and Navy Academy. (n.d.). English. Retrieved from https://www.armyandnavyacademy.org/academics-military-school/academy-curriculum/english/
2. Benjamin, L. T. (2006). A history of teaching and learning in psychology. Blackwell Publishing.
3. Chappell, A. T. (2008). Police academy training: Comparing across curricula. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 31(1), 36–56. https://doi.org/10.1108/13639510810852567.
4. Driscoll, M. P. (2005). Psychology of learning for instruction. Pearson Allyn & Bacon.
5. Gibbs, B., & McKay, L. (2021). Implementing differentiated instruction in secondary schools: A critical literature review. Educational Review, 73(4), 441-457. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2020.1735936