The comparison of different methods of determining the rock density from gravity data

Author:

ZAHOREC Pavol,MIKUŠKA Ján,PAPČO Juraj,PAŠTEKA Roman

Abstract

We focus on two methods of determining the density of the rock environment based on gravimetric measurements. The first method, a combined underground-surface approach, relies on recent measurements made at pairs of points along the vertical. One point is located in accessible underground spaces, like tunnels, mine workings, or caves, while the other is on the Earth's surface. The second, surface method, is solely based on the analysis of the Gravimetric Database of the Slovak Republic. Both methods are based on the proportionality between free-air anomalies and the gravitational effect of topographic masses, calculated for unit density. We compare the respective outputs of both methods and attempt to understand the existing differences between them. We also confront the density estimates in question with one of the two existing density maps of Slovakia compiled from density measurements on rock samples. Across a total of 14 measured locations, we observe a relatively wide spectrum of values on the agreement-disagreement scale, ranging from close similarity to relatively significant differences.

Publisher

Central Library of the Slovak Academy of Sciences

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3