Affiliation:
1. 1School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, United Kingdom
Abstract
The purpose of this multistudy paper was to explore (a) the coaching behaviors of male coaches when coaching either male or female teams through a systematic observation (Study 1) and (b) male and female coaches’ reasons for employing certain behaviors and practices when coaching female athletes through semistructured interviews (Study 2). Collectively, the findings of these two studies highlighted that coaches, either consciously or unconsciously, use a “gender lens” to coach their athletes. Study 1 findings showed that male coaches organize practice sessions (e.g., longer sessions for female than male athletes) and manifest coaching behaviors (e.g., more reinforcement for female than male athletes) that are different depending on whether they coach teams that comprise male or female athletes. Study 2 findings revealed gender biases in the approaches and styles coaches employed to coach their female and male athletes, suggesting that such methods could be limiting female athletes’ physical, social-emotional, and psychological development. This multistudy paper discusses how coaches’ good intentions to coach effectively can fall short and into a trap of gender stereotypes, leading to coaching the gender of the athletes as opposed to coaching each one athlete as an individual. The implications of these findings for practice are discussed.
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献