Disagreement of Rehabilitation Adherence Perceptions Among Athletic Trainers and Injured Collegiate Athletes

Author:

Torres Luis1,Davis Shala E.2,Shotwell Colleen A.3,Gardin Fredrick A.1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Exercise Science and Physical Education, Montclair State University, Montclair, NJ, USA

2. Department Chair, Department of Exercise Science, East Stroudsburg University of Pennsylvania, East Stroudsburg, PA, USA

3. Department of Athletics, East Stroudsburg University of Pennsylvania, East Stroudsburg, PA, USA

Abstract

Collegiate athletic trainers continue to report adherence to physical rehabilitation programs to be a problem in collegiate athletics, as rehabilitation adherence among collegiate athletes can range between 40% and 90%. Inconsistent appropriate adherence to these programs may limit patients’ ability to successfully recover from their sports injuries. This study sought to understand if differences in perception of rehabilitation adherence existed between athletic trainers and collegiate athletes. A nonsignificant fair inverse correlation was found between the athletic trainer perceptions and patient self-perceptions of rehabilitation adherence after an examination of 19 separate physical rehabilitation programs led by 5 collegiate athletic trainers (R = −.48, p = .06). Given the found practitioner–patient disconnect, collegiate athletic trainers should consider further encouraging patient involvement within their rehabilitation programs through various tactics such as the use of patient-rated outcomes or conversations that minimize patient distress.

Publisher

Human Kinetics

Reference21 articles.

1. World Health Organization. Adherence to Long Term Therapies—Evidence for Action. World Health Organization; 2003.

2. Development of a measure of rehabilitation adherence for athletic training;Granquist MD,2010

3. Adherence to sports-injury rehabilitation programs;Brewer BW,1998

4. A model for rehabilitation adherence in athletes demonstrating different attachment styles;Meyers NL,2016

5. Certified athletic trainers’ perspectives on rehabilitation adherence in collegiate athletic training settings;Granquist MD,2014

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3